Hi,
I am upgrading from Solr 6.5.1 to solr 8.6.1 and have noticed a change in
the Edismax parser behavior which is affecting our search results. If user
operators are present in the search query, the Solr 6 behavior was to take
mm parameters from the user query string which was 0% by default if not
On 1/19/2021 4:19 PM, ufuk yılmaz wrote:
Lets say I had only 1 replica for each collection but I split it to 6 shards, 1
for every node.
Or I had 2 shards (1 shard is too big for a single node I think) but I had 3
replicas, 3x2=6, 1 on every node.
How would it affect the performance?
It all
I’m trying to learn all I can on Solr for a year now and I still scratch my
head when it comes to effects of shards and replicas on performance.
- info about my setup
We have a SolrCloud setup with 6 nodes.
Each collection has 2 shards and 2 replicas. 1 shard’s size is about 100GB.
Each
Thanks for replying, Dave.
I am afraid that I am looking for non-index time i.e. query time solution.
Actually in my case I am expecting both documents to be returned from your
example. I am just trying to avoid returning of documents which contain a
tokenized versions
of the provided search quer
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_6_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/analysis/ReversedWildcardFilterFactory.html
?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:01 AM mosheB wrote:
>
> Hi, is there any sophisticated way [using the schema] to block brutal regex
> queries?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: https://lucene
We had the same requirement. Just to echo back your requirements, I understand
your case to be this. Given these 2 doc titles:
doc 1: "information retrieval"
doc 2: "Advanced information retrieval with Solr"
You want a phrase search for "information retrieval" to find both documents,
but an EXA
Hi,
I am aware that to do exact matching (only whatever is provided inside
double quotes should be matched) in Solr, we can copy existing fields with
the help of copyFields into new fields that have very minimal tokenization
or no tokenization (e.g. using KeywordTokenizer or using string field typ
Relevance Slack is open to anyone working on search & relevance - #solr is only
one of the channels, there's lots more! Hope to see you there.
Cheers
Charlie
https://opensourceconnections.com/slack
On 16/01/2021 02:18, matthew sporleder wrote:
IRC has kind of died off,
https://lucene.apache.
Hi, is there any sophisticated way [using the schema] to block brutal regex
queries?
Thanks
--
Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
