Re: Solr Delta Import Issue

Time for import - 5-6 minutes Warmup time - 40seconds autoCommit and autoSoftCommit setting both disabled and We fire commit only after the import is completed. I have some more doubt 1. In case of master-slave, is auto warm strategy is available for slaves 2. Also should I also have a limit

Solr Delta Import Issue

SOLR VERSION 6.0.0 As seen in the image, There is a spike which can be observed at every 2 hours. i.e whenever delta import runs 1. Response time doubles 2. CPU load average doubles and if it runs to near to peal hour than it goes even

Re: CustomScoreProvider Sucks, Need Help

But why when i am using customize sort, with just return it should work fast -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: SolrException: Error Instantiating queryParser, com.site.s.CustomQParserPlugin failed to instantiate org.apache.solr.search.QParserPlugin

Resolved by inclding solr on depency using maven -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

CustomScoreProvider Sucks, Need Help

public class MatchingScoreProvider extends CustomScoreProvider { } Issues: 1. CustomScoreProvider works but is too slow. Even when I am writing return 1 on 1st line it's still taking 5 seconds for 6lac row. 2. I added @Slf4j but still not logger not working -- Sent from:

Custom Solr Sorting + Query

I want to write a custom Solr query and sorting and when I am calling http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/techproducts/select?q={!myparsername}12=uid desc, some of the section as marked is not getting called. Issue: Documentation of solr customization is pretty poor Help: Can you please tell why my code

SolrException: Error Instantiating queryParser, com.site.s.CustomQParserPlugin failed to instantiate org.apache.solr.search.QParserPlugin

> I have created a custom query parser for Solr public class CustomQParserPlugin extends QParserPlugin { } >Then I have imported the jar into Solr lib directory. i.e placed in server/lib directory >I restarted the Solr > getting below error SolrException: Error Instantiating queryParser,

Solr Plugins Documentation

I got a basic understanding of how we can create the custom Solr plugin as illustrated in link https://dzone.com/articles/create-custom-solr-queryparser But I don't know the next step as for how can we create a jar. like do we need to import Solr source code ?? It would be of great help if

Re: Solr4 To Solr6 CPU load issues

cpu utlization is already on higher end, so VM wont seems a solution -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Solr Expression Slow

It cannot be done at indexing time. its based onloggedin user info -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Solr4 To Solr6 CPU load issues

top command in linux -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Solr4 To Solr6 CPU load issues

Yes, but how to move ahead now. Its strange solr4 is better behaving than solr6 -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Solr Expression Slow

In the below Solr query I am sorting based on the below expression. > sum(if(and(tf(CRITERIA1_FILTER,Y),if(tf(PARTNER_CRITERIA1,N),0,1)),1,0),if(and(tf(CRITERIA2_FILTER,Y),if(tf(PARTNER_CRITERIA2,1),0,1)),1,0)) > asc I have mentioned PARTNER_CRITERIA1 and PARTNER_CRITERIA2 in the expression. I

Re: Solr4 To Solr6 CPU load issues

I cant test on more as performance is already degraded. Its a 32core system and load 25 means 2500% cpu -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Solr4 To Solr6 CPU load issues

Hits 41 : Avg response time470ms vs 380ms CPU Load reaches6 vs 10 Hits 82: Avg response time 500ms vs 620ms (solr6 performing bad on peak hours) CPU Load reaches11 vs 25 -- Sent from:

Re: Solr4 To Solr6 CPU load issues

When both solr4 and solr6 have concurrent hits: 1. 30 to 40 : Avg response time 470ms vs 380ms Load 6 vs 10 1. 80 to 90 : Avg response time 500ms vs 620ms (solr6 performing bad on peak hours) Load 11 vs 25 -- Sent from:

Re: Solr4 To Solr6 CPU load issues

Other resource is not using the cpu. Its true that response is better to 300ms from 350ms but cpu usage almost doubled? -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Solr4 To Solr6 CPU load issues

Config : 64GB RAM 32 CORE CPU but i have given 20Gb to solr JVM.. Also its a shared resource -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Solr4 To Solr6 CPU load issues

I have upgraded Solr4.0 Beta to Solr6.6. The Cache results look Awesome but overall the CPU load on solr6.6 is double the load on solr4.0 and hence I am not able to roll solr6.6 to 100% of my traffic. *Some Key Stats In Performance of Sol6 Vs Solr4* Document cache usage increased from .98 from

Solr4 To Solr5 Upgrade Causing CPU issues

Hi Recently upgraded from solr4.0(tomcat) to solr5.3(tomcat) and my performance degraded to a very high level. Issues: My CPU consumption increased to the very high level of the same traffic. Note: My queries contains lots of in queries. What can be the issue here. I also tried solr6 with

Re: Solr Update If Record Exists ?

My version is timestamp. 1561379927065886720 So can i use it ? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Update-If-Record-Exists-tp4323767p4324152.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Solr Update If Record Exists ?

*SOLR_URL/update -d \' [ {"id" : "1", "ONLINE" : {"set":"1"} } ]'* I am using solr6.3. Above command works fine as it updates online flag to 1 for id=1. But the issue is if the record is not present then it adds a value as id=1 and online=1 which is not desired. So question is, is it

Re: Sorl 6 with jetty issues

Face similar issue on solr 6.1.0 -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorl-6-with-jetty-issues-tp4321291p4321308.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Sorl 6 with jetty issues

Issues with solr settings while migrating from solr 4.0 to solr6.0. Issue Faced: My CPU consumption goes to unacceptable levels. ie. load on solr4.0 is between 6 to 10 while the load on solr 6 reaches 100 and since its the production i rolled back quickly. My Solr4 setting - Running on tomcat

Solr6.0(Jetty) Vs Solr4.0(Tomcat)

Hi Recently upgraded from solr4.0(tomcat) to solr6.0(jetty) and my performance degraded to a very high level. Issues: My CPU consumption increased to the very high level with the same traffic. Note: My primary query contains lots of ids in not in query which requires CPU. My solr setting is the

Re: Complex Sort

I am not sure how to use "Sort By Function" for Case. |10#40|14#19|33#17|27#6|15#6|19#5|7#2|6#1|29#1|5#1|30#1|28#1|12#0|20#0| Can you tell how to fetch 40 when input is 10. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Complex-Sort-tp4267155p4267165.html Sent from the

Complex Sort

I have a column in Mysql and I need to do a complex sorting in Solr. Considering below column |175#40|173#17|174#13|134#11|17#8|95#4|64#3|116#3|343#0| where 175 indicates values to be matches and 40 implies score. So if logged in user value is 175 he will give a score of 40 and if the value

solr parallel update and total indexing Issue

There is a bis issue in solr parallel update and total indexing Total Import syntax (working) dataimport?command=full-importcommit=trueoptimize=true Update syntax(working) solr/update?softCommit=true' -H 'Content-type:application/json' -d '[{id:1870719,column:{set:11}}]'

solr parallel update and total indexing Issue

There is a bis issue in solr parallel update and total indexing Total Import syntax (working) dataimport?command=full-importcommit=trueoptimize=true Update syntax(working) solr/update?softCommit=true' -H 'Content-type:application/json' -d '[{id:1870719,column:{set:11}}]'

Re: How to customize Solr

the link you provided has no information about customizing -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-customize-Solr-tp4122551p4122760.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.