(ammount, type, ...) you are indexing
Best.
El 13/03/2015 a las 9:37, abhishek tiwari escribió:
solr indexing taking too much time .
What should i do to reduce time . working on solr 4.0.
--
Antonio Jesús Sánchez Padial
Jefe del Servicio de Biometría
antonio.sanc...@inia.es
Tlfno: +34 91
path correct (use absolute
path if in doubt).
Regards,
Alex.
Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 19 March 2015 at 00:35, abhishek tiwari test.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
Please provide the basic steps to resolve the issue
Please provide the basic steps to resolve the issue
Getting following error
Full Import failed:java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: Could
not load driver: com.mysql.jdbc.Driver Processing Document # 1
path to the jar directory. Hard to tell whether relative
path is correct without knowing exactly how you are running it.
Regards,
Alex.
Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 19 March 2015 at 01:00, abhishek tiwari test.mi
solr indexing taking too much time .
What should i do to reduce time . working on solr 4.0.
We are doing spatial search. with following logic.
a) There are shops in a city . Each provides the facility of home delivery
b) each shop has different max_delivery_distance .
Now my query is suppose some one is searching from point P1 with radius R.
User wants the result of shops those can
an AND or an OR?
Or at least fully express those two queries, unambiguously in plain
English. There is too much ambiguity present to give you any solid
direction.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Abhishek tiwari
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 12:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
the termfreq function.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Abhishek tiwari
abhishek.tiwari@gmail.com wrote:
http://xyz.com:8080/newschema/mainsearch/select/?q=*%3A*version=2.2start=0rows=10indent=onsort=termfreq%28cuisine_priorities_list,%27Chinese%27%29%20desc
Error : HTTP
when you index, Solr doesn't rearrange the
contents of a document.
If all you want to do is display the results within the document
in order, your app can do that as it builds the display page.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Abhishek tiwari
abhishek.tiwari@gmail.com wrote
,
sorry.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Abhishek tiwari
abhishek.tiwari@gmail.com wrote:
a) No. i do not want to sort the content within document .
I want to sort the documents .
b) As i have explained i have result set( documents ) and each document
contains a fields
Hi ,
i have multi valued field want to sort the docs order the particular
text eq:'B1' is added.
how i should query? ad_text is multivalued field.
t
doc
arr name=ad_text
strB1/str
strB2/str
strB3/str
/arr
/doc
doc
arr name=ad_text
strB2/str
strB1/str
strB3/str
/arr
/doc
doc
arr name=ad_text
.
So which one is better:
- 3 queries to independent cores and clubbing data
- Single query to one core which contains all the data.
Thanks
Abhishek
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com wrote:
On 8 March 2012 11:05, Abhishek tiwari abhishek.tiwari
result is a document in Solr.
3. Each displayed item is a stored field in Solr.
4. Each searched item is an indexed field in Solr.
It may help to think of this as a big flat materialized view in your DBMS.
wunder
Search Guy, Chegg.com
On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:56 PM, Abhishek tiwari wrote
, Abhishek tiwari wrote:
please suggest me when one should create multiple core..?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org
wrote:
Solr is not relational, so you will probably need to take a fresh look
at
your data.
Here is one method.
1. Sketch
, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com wrote:
On 8 March 2012 10:40, Abhishek tiwari abhishek.tiwari@gmail.com
wrote:
my page have layout in following manner
*All tab* :which will contain all entities (Establishment/Event/Movie)
Establishment: contain Establishment search
data ( stored data) to reduce
RDBMS query..
please suggest me how to proceed for schema design.. single core or
multiple core for each entity?
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com wrote:
On 6 March 2012 18:01, Abhishek tiwari abhishek.tiwari@gmail.com
wrote:
i
16 matches
Mail list logo