Re: Slow response times using *:*

2008-01-31 Thread Andy Blower
Yonik Seeley wrote: > > *:* maps to MatchAllDocsQuery, which for each document needs to check > if it's deleted (that's a synchronized call, and can be a bottleneck). > Why does this need to check if documents are deleted if normal queries don't? Is there any way of disabling this since I can

Re: Slow response times using *:*

2008-01-31 Thread Andy Blower
valued or tokenized fields? In that case, Solr uses > field queries which consume a lot of memory if the number of unique terms > are large. > > On Jan 31, 2008 9:13 PM, Andy Blower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I'm evaluating SOLR/Lucene for our needs and

Slow response times using *:*

2008-01-31 Thread Andy Blower
I'm evaluating SOLR/Lucene for our needs and currently looking at performance since 99% of the functionality we're looking for is provided. The index contains 18.4 Million records and is 58Gb in size. Most queries are acceptably quick, once the filters are cached. The filters select one or more of

Re: exact matches not possible?

2008-01-31 Thread Andy Blower
Disclaimer: I've only been working (evaluating) Solr for three weeks. I had exactly this issue, and I found that using a field of type string gave exact matches. So, if you need to do both substring and exact match queries, you'll need two fields. One non-tokenized field using class StrField and