Thanks Chris, it was as easy as adding the hostname to /etc/hosts to fix.
hossman_lucene wrote:
>
> : Anyone encounter a problem when changing their hostname? (via
> : /etc/conf.d/hostname or just the hostname command) I'm getting this
> error
> : when going to the admin screen, I have a feel
Anyone encounter a problem when changing their hostname? (via
/etc/conf.d/hostname or just the hostname command) I'm getting this error
when going to the admin screen, I have a feeling it's a simple fix. It
seems to work when it thinks the machine's name is just 'localhost'.
org.apache.jasper.
by name (which could be a param) altering
> the request params each time based on it's input, and consolidating all of
> hte results.
>
> : Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
> : From: Brian Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
Is there a way to fetch 5 records with group_id:1, 5 records with group_id:2,
5 records with group_id:3, and so forth in a single query?
The facet features don't seem to give me what I need -- same with rows. Any
ideas on how to do something like this?
--
View this message in context:
http:/
I'm getting the following when I used the "The Apache Tomcat Native library"
extensions in Gentoo:
Feb 13, 2007 12:55:42 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext
filterStart
SEVERE: Exception starting filter SolrRequestFilter
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at
org.apache.sol
Walter Underwood wrote:
>
>
> Use GET unless it really, really, really doesn't work. POST is
> the wrong HTTP semantic for fetching information. Long query
> strings are not a good enough reason. HTTP puts no limit on the
> length of a URL.
>
Walter, while your above statement may be true, s
Otis, very cool find indeed. This is certainly worth exploring for SOLR,
especially for the CNET guys and anybody else already using multiple
master/slave configurations.
After watching the video I may have to try it out myself.
Brian
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
> Now that Terracotta JVM clu
Just to clarify on this point, I am using highlighting in standardquery.
When I add a constraint and sort by a field, the highlighting function no
longer works. Possible bug or user error?
_
I can do it with standardrequest, but then it doesn't appear like I can sort
the results.
I'm experimenting with dismax to do faceted browsing, and when I add a
constraint with dismax on that facet, I no longer get the entire
facet-count.
i.e.
q=blah&qt=dismax&fq=type_id:1&hl=true&hl.fl=title+summary&hl.snippets=3&face
t=true&facet.limit=-1&facet.zeros=false&facet.field=type_id
Yonik, thanks for the tip.
Converting to 'integer' and deleting/reindexing fixed it. Can 'sint' be
used for the id with highlighting, or does one need to use integer or string
for that? Just trying to figure out if it's a bug with sint, or possibly
due to the fact I could have changed sint to i
I’m experiencing some unusual behavior when I perform a search with
highlighting enabled.
I’ve set up “id” as “sint” and indexed properly, but performing a search gives
the following result:
3.0647626
2
369845
1
Microsoft Reorganizes
Microsoft Reorganizes
3.0647626
Hi, I wanted to inquire if anybody would find an update flag useful that
only replaced the subset of data (ie a certain field) getting passed in,
instead of the whole record.
Pseudo-code for what I'm describing:
125125
true
+ RU
- EN
Hi Michael,
I apologize for the lack of testing on the SolPHP. I had to "strip" it down
significantly to turn it into a general class that would be usable and the
version up there has not been extensively tested yet (I'm almost ready to
get back to that and "revise" it), plus much of my coding is
Either Chris or Erik has been in contact with the author of this project,
IIRC.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Lewandowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 1:42 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: acts_as_solr
You might want to look at acts_as_search
Let's create it as a top-level directory solely because it might give people
a small head-start in SOLR evaluation and getting things off the ground
(less navigation around the tree to get started). If there are any
problems, we can always revert back to /contrib/clients.
B
-Original Message
arch() or query()
functionality (implemented in Java) somewhere that I could work off of.
phil.
On Jul 14, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Brian Lucas wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolJava
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: WHIRLYCOTT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July
specific on the wiki that you're able to point me at?
phil.
On Jul 14, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Brian Lucas wrote:
> Check the wiki, my friend.
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: WHIRLYCOTT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 14,
Check the wiki, my friend.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr
-Original Message-
From: WHIRLYCOTT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 12:35 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: client code for searching?
Yes, I need java, but I would be eager to read your python c
eir PHP distribution.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 9:35 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java or PHP code to trigger solr?
On Jun 28, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Brian Lucas wrote:
> Ok, I uploaded the
ginal Message-
From: Michael J. Giarlo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:52 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java or PHP code to trigger solr?
I believe Brian Lucas was writing PHP bindings --
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolPHP
How's that going,
It sounds like many people (myself included) try to avoid using yet another
application server (Tomcat) initially. While I think it's already been
alluded to pretty well, it might be a good idea to stress on the Solr wiki
that the Jetty instance isn't fully debugged and is only recommended for
pro
tracted so no XML or HTTP is seen by the
client code.
Erik
On Jun 1, 2006, at 8:49 PM, Brian Lucas wrote:
> Yes, I have written bindings but hadn't abstracted them fully.
> They're
> pretty solid and since you're the second person that's asked, let
&g
nik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 6:17 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SolPHP
Nothing in SVN... It looks like Brian Lucas might have been working on
something:
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user%40lucene.apache.org/msg0032
I've got some PHP and Ruby/Rails bindings I'll contribute soon enough as
well which will make integration with those environments fairly simple as
well.
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 7:39 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subj
I had the same issue some time back. I think the problem is that you need
to create solr/conf and solr/data under the tomcat root, not inside
"webapps".
For instance:
TOMCAT HOME = /usr/local/tomcat/
SOLR CONFIG = /usr/local/tomcat/solr/conf/
SOLR DATA = /usr/local/tomcat/solr/data/
SOLR WEB
Is anyone working on Ruby bindings? I noticed a page called "SolRuby" on
the wiki - what is this?
I would like to make Solr work like a model in Rails if possible, but don't
want to reinvent the wheel.
Thanks, Brian
/uncommon case ("Search POST Problem in Jetty start.jar")?
Thanks, Brian
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 2:21 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Possible to HTTP POST (very long) queries?
On 4/19/06, B
Hi Chris,
Two things which may not necessarily be related:
1. Regarding HTTP POST, I dropped in the 'start.jar' from the 04-19-2006
build and still have the same error. Something as simple as this example
should work, right?
--
http://localhost:8080/solr/select";>
-
Stil
Chris, thanks for the reply. I have an easy question: What's the syntax?
Changing "GET" to "POST" in the form gives me:
Apr 19, 2006 6:37:05 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.xmlpull.v1.XmlPullParserException: only whitespace content
allowed before start tag and not q (pos
I'm attempting to send a very long / large query to Solr and I'm
encountering an issue under Jetty for this query that I'm passing. It's
more than likely hitting a hard-coded somewhere for the maximum length of
the URL that was designed as a safety measure. I'm not sure if Tomcat
would fare diff
Hello there. I moved from Lucene to Solr and am thus far impressed with the
speed, even with the added XML transport necessary to send and receive data.
However, one thing I did like about the Lucene implementation was the
ability to specify indices for each invocation.
I agree with Michael
31 matches
Mail list logo
