Emir
> > --
> > Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> > Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 14 Jul 2020, at 14:00, Chris Dempsey wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm t
I'm trying to understand the difference between something like
fq={!cache=false}(tag:* -tag:email) which is very slow compared to
fq={!cache=false}(*:* -tag:email) on Solr 7.7.1.
I believe in the case of `tag:*` Solr spends some effort to gather all of
the documents that have a value for `tag` and
eters.html#cache-parameter
>
> Hope it helps,
> Alex.
>
> On Thu., Jul. 9, 2020, 2:05 p.m. Chris Dempsey, wrote:
>
> > Hi all! In a collection where we have ~54 million documents we've noticed
> > running a query with the following:
> >
> > "fq&qu
Hi all! In a collection where we have ~54 million documents we've noticed
running a query with the following:
"fq":["{!cache=false}_class:taggedTickets",
"{!cache=false}taggedTickets_ticketId:100241",
"{!cache=false}companyId:22476"]
when I debugQuery I see:
"parsed_filter_querie
@Mikhail
Thanks for the link! I'll read through that.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:28 AM Chris Dempsey wrote:
> @Erick,
>
> You've got the idea. Basically the users can attach zero or more tags (*that
> they create*) to a document. So as an example say they've created
avoid these
> expensive wildcard queries. Here's why it's worth to avoid them
> https://www.slideshare.net/lucidworks/search-like-sql-mikhail-khludnev-epam
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 6:17 PM Chris Dempsey wrote:
>
> > Hello, all! I'm relatively new to Solr and Luc
u can process the data such that you won’t need wildcards.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Jun 29, 2020, at 11:16 AM, Chris Dempsey wrote:
> >
> > Hello, all! I'm relatively new to Solr and Lucene (*using Solr 7.7.1*)
> but
> > I'm looking into option
Hello, all! I'm relatively new to Solr and Lucene (*using Solr 7.7.1*) but
I'm looking into options for optimizing something like this:
> fq=(tag:* -tag:*paid*) OR (tag:* -tag:*ms-reply-unpaid*) OR
tag:*ms-reply-paid*
It's probably not a surprise that we're seeing performance issues with
somethin
t; explanation.
>
> And yes, your understanding of adding a new field is correct
>
> Best,
> Erick
> On Mon, May 25, 2020, 11:39 Chris Dempsey wrote:
>
> > I'm new to Solr and made an honest stab to finding this in info the docs.
> >
> > I'm work
I'm new to Solr and made an honest stab to finding this in info the docs.
I'm working on an update to an existing large collection in Solr 7.7 to add
a BoolField to mark it as "soft deleted" or not. My understanding is that
updating the schema will mean the new field will only exist and have a
val
10 matches
Mail list logo
