Re:Possible bug on LTR when using solr 8.6.3 - index out of bounds DisiPriorityQueue.add(DisiPriorityQueue.java:102)

Hello Florin Babes, Thanks for this detailed report! I agree you experiencing ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException during SolrFeature computation sounds like a bug, would you like to open a SOLR JIRA issue for it? Here's some investigative ideas I would have, in no particular order:

Re: increasing number of threads for faceting in JSON format

the lines in the github. Your answer is very helpful. Cheers, Arturas On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 7:08 PM Munendra S N wrote: > Thank you Christine. > Yeah, JSON facet does not support specifying threads. > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020, 11:15 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <

Re: increasing number of threads for faceting in JSON format

Hello Arturas and Munendra! In the "Currently, JSON facets have support for specifying the number of threads." sentence, I wonder if perhaps a "does not" got inadvertently omitted i.e. "Currently, JSON facets does not have support for specifying the number of threads." was intended? Let me

Re:json.facet floods the filterCache

Hi Damien, You mention about JSON term facets, I haven't explored w.r.t. that but we have observed what you describe for JSON range facets and I've started https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14939 about it. Hope that helps. Regards, Christine From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At:

Re: Replication of Solr Model and feature store

Hi Krishan, Could you share what version of Solr you are using? And I wonder if the observed behaviour could be reproduced e.g. with the techproducts example, changes not applying after reload [1] sounds like a bug if so. Hope that helps. Regards, Christine [1]

Re:Unable to log into Jira

Hi Richard, Sorry to hear you're experiencing log-in difficulties. I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19280 for this, hopefully it can be read without logging in. Regards, Christine From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 10/15/19 16:31:36To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org

Re:Facing issue ith MinMaxNormalizer

Hello Kamal Kishore, Thanks for including the Solr version alongside your question! What you describe sounds like the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11163 issue which is fixed in 7.0.0 but not 6.6.2 release. The fix is a simple two line change to MinMaxNormalizer and perhaps one

Re: NPE deleting expired docs (SOLR-13281)

Thank you for sharing that 7.6 has the same issue. If anyone is interested in delving into the code to investigate further, I've added short steps on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13281 as to how one could potentially make a start on that. From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At:

Re: Navigating through Solr Source Code

Hello. Emir mentioned about starting from the feature/concept. If you haven't come across it yet then the slides and/or recording of Hoss's "Lifecycle of a Solr Search Request" talk may be of interest - http://home.apache.org/~hossman/ has links. Erick mentioned about getting a sense via unit

Re: SOLR 7.2 and LTR

From a (very) quick look it seems like the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11501 upgrade notes might be relevant, potentially. From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 12/28/17 15:18:22To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: SOLR 7.2 and LTR Do you have the ltr qparser plugin

RE: LTR feature extraction performance issues

Hi Brian, I just tried to explore the scenario you describe with the techproducts example and am able to see what you see: # step 1: start solr with techproducts example and ltr enabled # step 2: upload one feature (originalScore) and one model using that feature # step 3: examine cache stats

Re:Strange Behavior When Extracting Features

Hi Michael, Thanks for reporting this here and via SOLR-11386 ticket! I've just added a note to the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11386 ticket. Christine - Original Message - From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 09/20/17 20:07:24 Hi all,

Learning-to-Rank with Bees: question answer follow-up

Hi everyone, At my "Learning-to-Rank with Apache Solr and Bees" talk on Friday [1] there was one question that wasn't properly understood (by me) and so not fully answered in the room but later in individual conversation the question/answer became clearer. So here I just wanted to follow-up

Re:SOLR Learning to Rank Questions

Hello Joao! re: your first question, at present there is no direct way to use document hits in an external SQL database in a feature. Having said that, Solr has a so-called "ExternalFileField" type and using that in combination e.g. with the "FieldValueFeature" feature class should work, I

Re:Opposite termfrequency / Solr LTR

Hi Stefan, Thanks for the question. The existing FieldValueFeature class uses the field value and you would instead like to map the value to a number that will vary from query to query. External feature information (efi) can help with the query-to-query variation but for the mapping we don't

Re:solr learning_to_rank (normalizer) unmatched argument type issue

Hi Jianxiong, Thanks for reporting this. I think this is a bug and have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10421 ticket for fixing it. Regards, Christine - Original Message - From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 03/31/17 23:19:27 Hi,

Re: LTR on multiple shards

Hello Vincent and Michael, Thank you for the question and answer here. I have added an 'Applying changes' section to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Learning+To+Rank and changed https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Managed+Resources to cross-reference to the

Re:Learning to rank - Bad Request

Hi Vincent, Would you be comfortable sharing (redacted) details of the exact upload command you used and (redacted) extracts of the features json file that gave the upload error? Two things I have encountered commonly myself: * uploading features to the model endpoint or model to the feature

Re:NPE when executing clustering query search

Hi Tim, Thanks for reporting this. The (just created) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9775 issue and associated pull request sound related to this. Regards, Christine - Original Message - From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 03/22/16

Re:5.5.0 SOLR-8621 deprecation warnings without maxMergeDocs or mergeFactor

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8734 created for follow-up. - Original Message - From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: Feb 24 2016 22:41:14 Hi Markus - thank you for the question. Could you advise if/that the solrconfig.xml has a element (for

Re:5.5.0 SOLR-8621 deprecation warnings without maxMergeDocs or mergeFactor

Hi Markus - thank you for the question. Could you advise if/that the solrconfig.xml has a element (for which deprecated warnings would appear separately) or that the solrconfig.xml has no element? If either is the case then yes based on the code (SolrIndexConfig.java#L153) the warnings

solr 4.8.1 to 4.10.4 upgrade / luceneMatchVersion

Hello. We would like to upgrade from solr 4.8.1 to 4.10.4 and for existing collections (at least initially) continue to use the 4.8 lucene format rather than the latest 4.10 format. Two main reasons for the preference: (a) no need to worry about a not-yet-upgraded 4.8 replica recovering from

indexing delay due to zookeeper election

Hello. The behaviour we observed was that a zookeeper election took about 2s plus 1.5s for reading the zoo_data snapshot. During this time solr tried to establish connections to any zookeeper in the ensemble but only succeeded once a leader was elected *and* that leader was done reading the

Re: indexing delay due to zookeeper election

Sure. https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/SOLR-5577 filed. Thanks. - Original Message - From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org To: Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON), solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: Dec 23 2013 18:12:50 Interesting stuff! This is expected but not really something I