Re: Different queries for same meaning searches

2012-08-21 Thread Dalius Sidlauskas
Yes, the mm is 100%. Thank you for a detailed answer. Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 21/08/12 15:21, Jack Krupansky wrote: Solr doesn't actually "know" any natural language, so it has no way of assessing whether two token streams "have the same meaning." In your case,

Different queries for same meaning searches

2012-08-21 Thread Dalius Sidlauskas
na) | (search_title:d search_title:osona) )) DisjunctionMaxQuery((search_definitions:"d osona" | search_title:"d osona"^3.0)) And the results are different as well. Where I can find explanation for this? -- Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas

Re: Debug Query returns different debug explanation output for documents

2012-07-09 Thread Dalius Sidlauskas
Does these settings somehow are involved into this? edismax 2<-25% Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 09/07/12 11:23, Dalius Sidlauskas wrote: Hello, I have a query that returns different debug explanation output for some reason. First document has no "(MATCH) pr

Debug Query returns different debug explanation output for documents

2012-07-09 Thread Dalius Sidlauskas
7597 = idf(docFreq=11900, maxDocs=434581) 0.5 = fieldNorm(field=search_title, doc=8120) 0.75 = coord(3/4) Can anyone explain what happens here? Thank you in advance! -- Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas

Re: Hi

2012-02-10 Thread Dalius Sidlauskas
Hi, I don't think this is the right place for this question. You should follow samples of solr client api integration in Java and develop your way in konakart.. Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 10/02/12 08:25, sumal wrote: My self I am Sumal who working as a Software Engineer. Currently

Re: Wildcard ? issue?

2012-02-09 Thread Dalius Sidlauskas
Okay, I get it, 3.6 is not released yet. Thanks for help fellas! Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 09/02/12 10:19, Dalius Sidlauskas wrote: It seams it is applicable for Solr 3.6 and 4.0. Mines version is 3.5 Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 08/02/12 17:26, Ahmet Arslan wrote: I have already

Re: Wildcard ? issue?

2012-02-09 Thread Dalius Sidlauskas
It seams it is applicable for Solr 3.6 and 4.0. Mines version is 3.5 Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 08/02/12 17:26, Ahmet Arslan wrote: I have already tried this and it did not helped because it does not highlight matches if wild-card is used. The field configuration turns data to: This

Re: Wildcard ? issue?

2012-02-08 Thread Dalius Sidlauskas
? startOffset 0 endOffset 10 org.apache.solr.analysis.ICUFoldingFilterFactory {luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_34} position1 term text calligra? startOffset 0 endOffset 10 Is this a Solr or Lucene bug? Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 08/02/12 16:03, Sethi

Re: Wildcard ? issue?

2012-02-08 Thread Dalius Sidlauskas
If you can not read this mail easily check this ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3106 This is a copy. Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas On 08/02/12 15:44, Dalius Sidlauskas wrote: Sorry for inaccurate title. I have a 3 fields (dc_title, dc_title_unicode, dc_unicode_full

Wildcard ? issue?

2012-02-08 Thread Dalius Sidlauskas
·lígra?^3.0 | dc_title_unicode_full:cal·lígra?^3.0)) Should the second be "*calligra?*" insted?* *Environment: Tomcat 7.0.25 (request encoding UTF-8) Solr 3.5.0 Java 7 Oracle Ubuntu 11.10 -- Regards! Dalius Sidlauskas