Ravi, what about using field aliasing at search time? Would that do the
trick for your use case?
http://localhost:8983/solr/mycollection/select?defType=edismaxq=name:john
doef.name.qf=firstname surname
For more details:
In Solr 5 (or 4), is there an easy way to retrieve the list of words to
highlight?
Use case: allow an external application to highlight the matching words
of a matching document, rather than using the highlighted snippets
returned by Solr.
Thanks,
Damien
? There are
sometimes
very good reasons, just checking that you're not making things more
difficult
than necessary
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Damien Dykman damien.dyk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Quoted from
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Solr+Start
Hi all,
Quoted from
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Solr+Start+Script+Reference
When running multiple instances of Solr on the same host, it is more
common to use the same server directory for each instance and use a
unique Solr home directory using the -s option.
Is there a
The /export request handler mandates a sort order. Is there a particular
reason?
It'd be nice to have the option to tell Solr: just export in the order
you want, to limit any kind of overhead added by sorting. Or am I
missing something? If exports were distributed, I can see the need for
some
Hi all,
With an implicit collection, is it legal to index the same document
(same unique ID) in 2 different shards? I know, it kind of defeats the
purpose of having a unique ID...
The reason I'm doing this, is because I want to move a single document
from 1 shard to an other. During the
Thanks for your suggestions and recommendations.
If I understand correctly, the MIGRATE command does shard splitting
(around the range of the split.key) and merging behind the scene.
Though, it's a bit difficult to properly monitor the actual migration,
set the proper timeouts, know when to
I have a cluster of N boxes/nodes and I'd like to add M boxes/nodes and
rebalance data accordingly.
Lets add the following constraints:
- 1. boxes have different characteristics (RAM, CPU, disks)
- 2. different number of shards per box/node (lets pretend we have
found the sweet spot for
(disabling
MMAP?), given that it's not being used for search during the transition?
That said, even if that was possible, both collections would compete for
disk IOs.
Thanks,
Damien
On 07/07/2014 12:26 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 7/7/2014 12:41 PM, Damien Dykman wrote:
I have a cluster of N boxes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Modassar,
I ran into the same issue (Solr 4.8.1) with an existing collection set
to implicit routing but with no router.field defined. I managed to
set the router.field by modifying /clusterstate.json and pushing it
back to Zookeeper. For
Is a commit (hard or soft) atomic across shards?
In other words, can I guaranty that any given search on a multi-shard
collection will hit the same index generation of each shard?
Thanks,
Damien
11 matches
Mail list logo