Hi,
I hava a dynamic field E_*
I want to seach for E_abc*:something
Is there any way i can do this in solr.
If not possible in Solr 3.4 , does Solr 4.0 includes wildcard query on
dynamic field.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
some time and in that
time say some new documents are added than will it add that documents in
the ongoing autocommit operation or it will immediately start a new
autocommit for the new documents added(say max timeout occured) once the
ongoing autocommit is done.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
) by continuously adding more
documents.
Thanks,
Isan Fulia,.
On 14 November 2011 19:41, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Isan Fulia wrote:
>
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > In the above case , what if the index is optimized partly ie. by
> > specifyi
in different shards.
Thanks,
Isan Fulia.
On 14 November 2011 11:28, Kalika Mishra wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> What you saying is interesting; so are you suggesting that optimizations
> should be done usually when there not many updates. Also can you
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the information.But why is it that once omiited positions in the
past , it will always omit positions
even if omitPositions is made false.
Thanks,
Isan Fulia.
On 29 September 2011 17:49, Michael McCandless wrote:
> Once a given field has omitted positions in the past, e
> > The schema.xml seems OK to me.
> >
> > Is "textForQuery" the only field you are searching in ?
> > Are you also searching on any other non text based fields ? If yes,
> please
> > provide schema description for those fields also.
> > Also, provide you
uot;coke studio at
mtv" but still the query is not returning any documents when searched for
*textForQuery:"coke studio at mtv"*
Can anyone please help me out why this is happening
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
chema file.
*
*
Thanks,
Isan Fulia.
On 26 September 2011 21:19, Rahul Warawdekar wrote:
> Hi Isan,
>
> Does your search return any documents when you remove the 'at' keyword and
> just search for "Coke studio MTV" ?
> Also, can you please provide the snippet
e of textForQuery as *Coke Studio at MTV*?
Is this because of the stopword *at* present in stopwordList?
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
don't say a reindex is necessary, then it's not, but
> always a good idea to try it and run any tests you have handy.
>
>Erik
>
>
>
> On Sep 19, 2011, at 00:02 , Isan Fulia wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
> >
> > Ya we need to upgrade but my question
Hi ,
Ya we need to upgrade but my question is whether reindexing of all cores is
required
or
we can directly use already indexed data folders of solr 3.3 to solr 3.4.
Thanks,
Isan Fulia.
On 19 September 2011 11:03, Wyhw Whon wrote:
> If you are already using Apache Lucene 3.1, 3.2 or
Hi all,
Does upgrading solr from 3.3 to 3.4 requires reindexing of all the cores or
we can directly copy the data folders to
the new solr ?
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
behaving as
> > unique key. Multiple documents with same value for the unique key are
> > getting indexed.
> > Does anyone know why this is happening or is it that the field of type
> > lowercase cannot be unique key.
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
field of type
lowercase cannot be unique key.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
& Regards,
Isan Fulia.
Hi Ephraim/Jen,
Can u share that diagram with all.It may really help all of us.
Thanks,
Isan Fulia.
On 6 April 2011 10:15, Tirthankar Chatterjee wrote:
> Hi Jen,
> Can you please forward the diagram attachment too that Ephraim sent. :-)
> Thanks,
> Tirthankar
>
> ---
RAMBufferSizeMB.
> > should set value less than it. if you setRAMBufferSizeMB to 2700m and
> > the other 3 conditions are not
> > triggered, I think it will hit OOM exception.
> >
> > 2011/3/28 Isan Fulia :
> >> Hi all ,
> >>
> >> I woul
rambufferSize is alloted outside the heap memory(2700M)?
How does rambuffersize is related to out of memory errors.
What is the optimal value for rambuffersize.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
Hi all,
Does anyone know what does m on the y -axis stands for in req/sec graph for
update handler .
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
Hi all,
I am using StreamingUpdateSolrServer with queuesize = 5 and threadcount=4
The no. of connections created are same as threadcount.
Is it that it creates a new connection for every thread.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
i fire the same
query .
Does anyone know how to do it.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
7;t slowed down by warming.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Isan Fulia
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have setup two indexes one for reading(R) and other for
> writing(W).Index R
> > refers to the same data dir of W (defined in solrconfig via ).
&
compared to using the
same index for reading and writing .
Can anyone help me in knowing why this performance improvement is taking
place even though both the indexeses are pointing to the same data
directory.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
sion for this may be 1.5
>
> -
> Thanx:
> Grijesh
> http://lucidimagination.com
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/facet-mincount-tp2411930p2414232.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
mincount works with date faceting, see here:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
>
> Dan
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Isan Fulia
> wrote:
> > Any query followed by
> >
> >
> &facet=on&facet.date=aUpdDt&facet.date.start=20
; wrote:
> could you post the query you are submitting to Solr?
>
> On 3 February 2011 09:33, Isan Fulia wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > Even after making facet.mincount=1 , it is showing the results with count
> =
> > 0.
> > Does anyone know why this is happening.
Hi all,
Even after making facet.mincount=1 , it is showing the results with count =
0.
Does anyone know why this is happening.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
ches
>
> NOTE: I haven't applied that specific patch to 1.4.1, so I don't know what
> gremlins
> are hanging around.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Isan Fulia >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I want to know how to apply patch for
Hi all,
I want to know how to apply patch for extended dismax query parser on solr
1.4.1.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
Betreff: Re: DismaxParser Query
> >
> > What version of Solr are you using, and could you consider either 3x or
> > applying a patch to 1.4.1? Because eDismax (extended dismax) handles the
> > full Lucene query language and probably works here. See the Solr
> > JIRA
> query
> > something like q.op=OR
> >
> >
> >
> > On 27 January 2011 11:26, Isan Fulia wrote:
> >
> >> but q="keyword1 keyword2" does AND operation not OR
> >>
> >> On 27 January 2011 16:22, lee carroll
> >> wro
,feild2,field3
> mm=something sensible for you
> defType=dismax
> fq=" field4:(keyword3 OR keyword4) AND field5:(keyword5)"
>
> take a look at the dismax docs for extra params
>
>
>
> On 27 January 2011 08:52, Isan Fulia wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
& Regards,
Isan Fulia.
Hi all,
By adding more servers do u mean sharding of index.And after sharding , how
my query performance will be affected .
Will the query execution time increase.
Thanks,
Isan Fulia.
On 19 January 2011 12:52, Grijesh wrote:
>
> Hi Isan,
>
> It seems your index size 25GB si much m
ing?
> What is you ramBufferSize?
>
> -
> Thanx:
> Grijesh
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Out-of-Memory-Error-tp2280037p2285392.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Isan Fulia.
M settings and Solr
> version.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Tuesday 18 January 2011 15:08:35 Isan Fulia wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I got the following error on solr with m/c configuration 4GB RAM and
> > Intel Dual Core Processor.Can you please help me out.
> >
> > java.
Hi all,
I got the following error on solr with m/c configuration 4GB RAM and Intel
Dual Core Processor.Can you please help me out.
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
2011-01-18 18:00:27.655:WARN::Committed before 500 OutOfMemoryError likely
caused by the Sun VM Bug described in
https:/
37 matches
Mail list logo
