Edismax should be able to handle a query consisting of only query-time stop
words.
What does your text field type analyzer look like?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Kumar
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 9:59 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Searching
Look at org.apache.solr.response.BinaryResponseWriter. This serializes from
a SolrQueryResponse. There is no direct XML to JavaBin serialization.
It uses org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec.
This is the server side processing. For the client side, see the SolrJ
package.
-- Jack
in the q query, but if the slop is 1, they won't
necessarily be required to be adjacent in the boost.
pf, pf2, and pf3 are all related. As are ps, ps2, and ps3.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:11 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Is url a string field or is it text (and hence analyzed, which
typically removes all punctuation)?
A URL typically needs to be stored as both string and text so that the user
can do both exact match and keyword match.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent
Query converter is a plugin if the app has special requirements.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Dyer, James
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 11:33 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers
That makes sense because the Query
the query
at the application level and generate a Solr query that has the synonyms
pre-expanded.
Application preprocessing could be as simple as scanning for the synonym
phrases and then adding OR terms for the synonym phrases.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent
the
autogeneratePhraseQuery attribute of the field type set to true.) But, I
don't recall the details... and it's not the default, which maybe it should
be.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 12:18 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Separate fields for URL as string and URL as keywords makes sense. You can
also use the URL classifier update processor or a regex filter to have a
third field to match solely the domain name, if that is needed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Friday
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: archit2112
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Auto Indexing in Solr
Hi Im using Solr 4's Data Import Utility to index Oracle 10g XE database. Im
using full imports as well as delta imports. I want
alert, more careful with your hardware selection and network design,
etc.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Nicole Lacoste
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 4:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: maximum number of documents per shard?
Is there a limit on the number
.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Radu Ghita
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 8:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: SolrCloud commit process is too time consuming, even if documents
are light
Hi,
We are having a client with business model that requires indexing each
talk of supporting streaming, which presumably
would allow access to all results, but chunked/paged in some way.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Tom Burton-West
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:39 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 4.2.1 limit on number of rows
patterns or lists of field names. (I have more
examples in my book.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Artem Karpenko
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:05 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Wildcard matching of dynamic fields
Hi,
given a dynamic field
dynamicField name
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Jain
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 3:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr Index Files in a Directories
I have flume sink directory where new files are being written periodically.
How can I instruct solr to index the files
Do your time range query, sort by the time field as descending, and take
the first result.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alok Bhandari
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:08 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: how to get unique latest results from solr
Hello All
In that case, the answer is that no, Solr does not have such a feature.
You could simulate it by doing a separate query (using the method I
suggested) for each of the 10 employees, one at a time.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alok Bhandari
Sent: Wednesday, July 24
Details here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/RealTimeGet
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 5:07 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Usage Of Real Time Get Handler Of Solr
Hi;
There is a real time get handler at Solr
The debugQuery=true parameter will give you an explain section that
details what terms matched in each document. There is an XML version as well
(debug.explain.structured).
Unfortunately, these are the analyzed (stemmed, lower case, synonyms
expanded) terms. Pick your poison!
-- Jack
Yes, per-field facet method is supported.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: GaneshSe
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: facet.method value per field
We are trying to use facet across multiple fields, we would like to know how
Solr supports pure negative queries, but only at the top level. Pure
negative sub-queries are not supported. To work around this limitation your
need to add *:* to the sub-query:
(offTime:[2013-07-24T14:35:46.319Z TO *]) OR (*:* NOT offTime:[* TO *])
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
There is no such thing as a qf filter - qf is simply a list of names of
fields to search for the terms from the query, q, as well as boost
factors. Filtering is done with filter queries - fq.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mysurf Mail
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:39 AM
that the top results will be more relevant.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 6:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Document Similarity Algorithm at Solr/Lucene
Actually I need a specialized algorithm. I want to use
The JSON keys within the highlighting object are the document IDs, and
then the keys within those objects are the highlighted field names.
Again, I repeat my question: Exactly why is it difficult to deserialize?
Seems simple enough.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mysurf
that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Jack Krupansky
j...@basetechnology.comwrote:
After restarting Solr and doing a couple of queries to warm the caches,
are queries already slow
Are you actually seeing that output from the WikipediaTokenizerFactory??
Really? Even if you use the Solr Admin UI analysis page?
You should just see the text tokens plus the URLs for links.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:53
performance . There is no hard limit besides
that 2.1 billion Lucene limit, but... performance will vary.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ali, Saqib
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 6:18 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: maximum number of documents per shard?
still 2.1
.TXT file.
In any case, Solr and Lucene do not support stop words that are regular
expressions, although a regex filter can simulate them to a limited degree.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Scatman
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 7:48 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
Could you please be more specific about the relevancy problem you are trying
to solve?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: eShard
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 9:57 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: how to improve (keyword) relevance?
Good morning,
I'm currently
Exactly why is it difficult to deserialize? Seems simple enough.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mysurf Mail
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 11:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: deserializing highlighting json result
When I request a json result I get
- qualification only applies to a single term, but you can use
parentheses: q=text%3A(test+pdf)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: eShard
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 12:34 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to improve (keyword) relevance?
Sure, let's say
Was all of this running fine previously and only started running slow
recently, or is this your first measurement?
Are very simple queries (single keyword, no filters or facets or sorting or
anything else, and returning only a few fields) working reasonably well?
-- Jack Krupansky
You need a dynamic field pattern for ignored_* to ignore unmapped
metadata.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: franagan
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: /update/extract error
Hi all,
im testing solrcloud (version 4.3.1) with 2
-title fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Joe Zhang
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 11:06 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Question about field boost
Dear Solr experts:
Here is my query:
defType=dismaxq=term1+term2qf=title^100 content
Apparently (at least I thought
processing are taking the most time. Also check
whether the reported QTime seems to match actual wall clock time; sometimes
formatting of the results and network transfer time can dwarf actual query
time.
How many fields are you returning on a typical query?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original
That means that for that document china occurs in the title vs. snowden
found in a document but not in the title.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Joe Zhang
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 12:52 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about field boost
Is my
to sorting, and Solr does have a
sort parameter:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#sort
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: cmd.ares
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 2:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Order by an expression in Solr
In SQL you can order
Okay, it’s hot off the e-presses: Solr 4.x Deep Dive, Early Access Release #3
is now available for purchase and download as an e-book for $9.99 on Lulu.com
at:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-1/ebook/product-21079719.html
(That link says “1
real_soon:[NOW+3DAYS TO NOW+10DAYS]
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jabouille Jean Charles
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 11:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Date for 4.4 solr release
Hi,
we are currently using solr 4.2.1. There are a lot of fix in the 4.4
Read:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Jain
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 1:55 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Indexing CSV files in a Folder
Hi
I have flume dumping CSV files in folders and I would like Solr
distinct groups there.
If you have a specific, narrow domain in mind, a thesaurus of concepts and
synonyms for that domain would help you a lot.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 12:33 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Collapsing
What field type analyzer and tokenizer are you using, and what does a sample
of the input data look like?
Generally, a single backslash I all that is needed for escaping.
And, escaping is not needed within a quoted phrase, except for quotes and
literal backslashes.
-- Jack Krupansky
Very good chance that is it.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 7:16 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: The way edismax parses colon seems weird
Could this be related:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR
As a workaround, enclose the term in quotes, without the escaping:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=12:34defType=edismaxdebug=queryqf=content
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: jefferyyuan
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 7:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: The way
As detailed in previous email, termfreq is not a field - it is a
transformer or function. Technically, it is actually a ValueSource.
If you look at the TextResponseWriter.writeVal method you can see you it
kicks off the execution of transformers for writing documents.
-- Jack Krupansky
It would probably be better to integrate the responses (document lists.)
Solr response writers do a lot of special processing of the response data,
so you can't just throw random objects into the response.
You may need to explain your use case a little more clearly.
-- Jack Krupansky
). Check it out:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/RealTimeGet
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Brian Hurt
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 10:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Getting a large number of documents by id
I have a situation which is common in our current use
with the Edge
n-gram token filter with a min and max of 3 so that It will index
INTERNATIONAL as itself plus INT.
And then maybe add a regex char filter to combine INT'L into INTL.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: kobe.free.wo...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 8:09 AM
In general, sorting doesn't work well for multivalued and tokenized fields.
You need to copy your tokenized url to a utl_str string field and then
sort that field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:54 AM
To: solr-user
future, not a here and now. Maybe in the 5.0 timeframe?
I don't want anyone to get the impression that there are off-the-shelf
patches that completely solve the synonym phrase problem. Yes, progress is
being made, but we're not there yet.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
I don't think that breakdown is readily available from Solr.
Sounds like a good Jira request for improvement in the response.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How can I learn
I would also note that the LucidWorks Search query parser implements
query-time synonym phrases. I don't know if anybody has anything better than
that. Unfortunately, that is proprietary and is kind of a workaround for
current Lucene/Solr limitations than a long-term solution.
-- Jack
counts.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How can I learn the total count of how many documents indexed
and how many documents updated?
I will open a Jira for it and apply a patch
Search for query-time phrase
synonyms, off-the-shelf, today, no patches required.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Roman Chyla
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Searching w/explicit Multi-Word Synonym Expansion
OK, let's do
as well. I didn't mean to discourage or denigrate the later,
just to highlight that doing custom code is not the same as solutions being
available off the shelf.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Roman Chyla
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 12:13 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
phrase.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: dmarini
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 2:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Searching w/explicit Multi-Word Synonym Expansion
Roman,
As a developer, I understand where you are coming from. My issue is that I
specialize
as a range query on a
substring in Solr or Lucene.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Marcin Rzewucki
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Range query on a substring.
By multivalued I meant an array of values. For example:
arr name
, and then a call to DocTransformers.transform() in each
response writer will evaluate the embedded function queries and insert their
values in the results as they are being written.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Tony Mullins
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 1:37 AM
To: solr-user
the positionIncrementGap (typically 100 for text.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Collins
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 8:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Are analysers applied to each value in a multi-valued field
separately?
I'm guessing the answer is yes, but here's
=text_limit4:a23;
Indicating that the token position limit filter does work, but only for the
relative position, making it not much more useful than the token count limit
filter.
Oh well.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Collins
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 12:18 PM
To: solr
.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: dmarini
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:23 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Searching w/explicit Multi-Word Synonym Expansion
Hi Everyone,
I'm using Solr (version 4.3) for the first time and through much research I
got into writing
values to a fixed number of digits with leading zeros, and then they
would be properly ordered. But, I don't think we have a token filter that
can do that, although I imagine that a new one could be proposed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Tuesday, July 16
need at least three zookeepers for HA. They need to be external to the
cluster in production.
* Load balancing - you need to do your own testing to confirm whether you
need it. If so, that is outside of Solr.
* SolrCloud automatically recovers nodes when they come back up.
-- Jack Krupansky
and is a
pain with phrases.
It is worth a Jira though.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 9:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to Indicate Solr That: Both Ascified and Non-Ascii versions of
tokens are same?
When I search
,
it is no different that highlighting tokens that have differences in upper
and lower case.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 9:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to Indicate Solr That: Both Ascified and Non-Ascii
so
hard just to avoid a few conditional statements in your app layer??
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: SolrLover
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 11:43 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to pass null OR empty values to fq?
Hi,
I am trying to pass empty values to fq
full
control in a custom script.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Weber
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 4:58 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Different 'fl' for first X results
How to get a different field list in the first X results? For example, in
the
first 5
Make sure that dynamicFields are within fields rather than types.
Solr tends to ignore misplaced configuration elements.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Scott Vanderbilt
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 5:10 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 4.3.1: Errors When
SOLR-5005 - JavaScriptRequestHandler
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5005
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 6:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Different 'fl' for first X results
Is there a JIRA
.
Scheduling is currently outside of the scope of Solr and SolrCloud.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: kowish.adamosh
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 8:42 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SolrCloud leader
The problem is that I don't want to invoke data import on 8 server
is that clearly updating all documents in the index is a
non-starter.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Burlaca
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 11:02 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: ACL implementation: Pseudo-join performance Atomic Updates
Hello all,
Situation:
We
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
That means you have some out of date jars or some newer jars mixed in with
the old ones.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Owen
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr
it
belongs and queries gets distributed to the nodes that have the data needed
to satisfy the queries.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: kowish.adamosh
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 5:11 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: SolrCloud leader
Hi guys,
Is it possible
and that distracts attention from optimizing
the full application architecture.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Radim Kolar
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SolrCloud leader
Since SolrCloud is a master-free architecture, you can send
.
This is an interesting issue to ponder.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: kowish.adamosh
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 10:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SolrCloud leader
Ya :-) I need it for different reason.
I have 8 server nodes and one of them has
query
(including the fl parameter) if you know a term that has a 1-to-1
relationship to your query results.
It is worth filing a Jira to add numfound() as a function query value
source.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Matt Lieber
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 1:45 AM
To: solr
is not an aggregate function. Ditto
for min and max.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: mihaela olteanu
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 1:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to set a condition over stats result
What if you perform sub(sum(myfieldvalue),100) 0 using
Did you put a boost of 0.0 on the documents, as opposed to the default of
1.0?
x * 0.0 = 0.0
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Joe Zhang
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 10:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: zero-valued retrieval scores
when I search a keyword
For the calculation of norm, see note number 6:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/similarities/TFIDFSimilarity.html
You would need to talk to the Nutch guys to see why THEY are setting
document boost to 0.0.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
as discrete
Solr documents.
But, it does all depend on your particular data and particular requirements.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Pompermaier
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 7:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: amount of values in a multi value field
no nodes can be down for the cluster to do updates.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Zhang, Lisheng
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 9:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: What happens in indexing request in solr cloud if Zookeepers are
all dead?
Hi,
In solr cloud
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jamshaid Ashraf
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 7:56 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Applying Sum on Field
Hi,
I'm a new solr user, I wanted to know is there any way to apply sum on a
field in a result document of group query
Sorry, no updates if no Zookeepers. There would be no way to assure that any
node knows the proper configuration. Queries are a little safer using most
recent configuration without zookeeper, but update consistency requires
accurate configuration information.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original
A couple of possibilities:
1. Make sure to reload the core.
2. Check that the Solr schema version is new enough to recognize
autoGeneratePhraseQueries.
3. What query parser are you using?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: James Bathgate
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 5:26
JavaScript logic you wanted.
When we get that feature, it might be interesting to implement a variation
of the standard stats component as a JavaScript script, and then people
could easily hack it such as in your request. Fascinating.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Matt
to imply that a 96-node or 128-node cluster won't
perform well.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ramkumar R. Aiyengar
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:03 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr limitations
I understand, thanks. I just wanted to check in case
You can't use two fields in one range query, but you can combine two range
queries:
startDate_tdt:[* TO NOW] AND endDate_tdt:[NOW TO *]
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Mendez
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:31 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: simple
as the full document. And, there is no way to
address or synchronize individual elements of multivalued fields.
Joins are great... if used in moderation. Heavy use of joins is not a great
idea.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Marcelo Elias Del Valle
Sent: Wednesday, July
idea.
1. Break things down.
2. Keep things simple.
3. Join is not simple.
4. Only use non-simple features in careful moderation.
There is no reasonable short cut to doing a robust data model. Shortcuts may
seem enticing in the short run, but will eat you alive in the long run.
-- Jack Krupansky
1. Try facet.missing=true to count the number of documents that do not have
a value for that field.
2. Try facet.limit=n to set the number of returned facet values to a larger
or smaller value than the default of 100.
3. Try reading the Faceting chapter of my book!
-- Jack Krupansky
Simple math: x times zero equals zero.
That's why the default document boost is 1.0 - score times 1.0 equals score.
Any particular reason you wanted to zero out the document score from the
document level?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Tony Mullins
Sent: Tuesday, July
in the results.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mysurf Mail
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 2:38 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: two types of answers in my query
Hi,
A general question:
Let's say I have Car And CarParts 1:n relation.
And I have discovered
I don't quite follow the question. Give us an example.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 9:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Document count mismatch
Ok, one more question. I have another field at my schema: *url
Solr (Lucene, actually) will be doing segment merge operations in the
background, continually, so generally you won't need to do optimize
operations.
Generally, an explicit delete and a replace of an existing document are the
only two ways that you would get a deleted document.
-- Jack
Your join is requesting to use the join_id field (from) of documents
matching the query of cor_parede:branca, but the join_id field of that
document is empty.
Maybe you intended to search in the other direction, like
acessorio1:Teclado.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From
Oops... I misread and confused your q and fq params.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 7:47 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: join not working with UUIDs
Your join is requesting to use the join_id field (from
suggested guidelines and you should do okay.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Marcelo Elias Del Valle
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 9:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr limitations
Hello everyone,
I am trying to search information about possible solr
a hybrid NoSql/Solr solution such as DataStax Enterprise, where
the data is persisted in Cassandra and indexed in Solr, allowing selective
updates of all fields.
See: http://www.datastax.com/
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Bram Van Dam
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:22 AM
Yes, you should be able to used nested query parsers to mix the queries.
Solr 4.1(?) made it easier.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Abeygunawardena, Niran
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 7:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Surround query parser not working
Nope.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 7:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Are the XML element names in schema.xml case sensitive?
But not dynamicField or any others?
Regards,
Alex
On 7 Jul 2013 23:39
is uncharted territory, and
there is no slam-dunk solution that is guaranteed to work really well for
all apps in all environments - be prepared to doing multiple Proof of
Concept implementations.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Marcelo Elias Del Valle
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013
1101 - 1200 of 2475 matches
Mail list logo
