MultiCore config less stable than SingleCore?

Hi, i have recently moved Solr at one of our customers to a MultiCore environment running 2 indexes. Since then, we seem to be having problems with locks not being removed properly, .lock files keep sticking around in the index directory. Hence, any updates to the index keep returning 500

MultiValue dynamicField and copyField

Hi everyone, i was wondering if the following was possible somehow: dynamicField name=*_m_i type=text indexed=true stored=false required=false multiValued=true/ dynamicField name=*_m_i_f type=string indexed=true stored=true required=false multiValued=true/ copyField source=*_m_i dest=*_m_i_f/

AW: MultiValue dynamicField and copyField

I figured out where the problem was. The destination wildcard was actually matching the wrong field. I changed the fieldnames around a bit and now everything works fine. Thanks! -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: kenf_nc [mailto:ken.fos...@realestate.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Juli

AW: Slow Date-Range Queries

For now I need them, I will however most likely (as suggested by Ahmet Arslan), create another boolean field to get rid of them, just simply due to the fact that I am switching to Solr 1.4 frange queries. On the topic of frange queries, is there a way to simulate the date range wildcards here?

AW: Slow Date-Range Queries

((valid_from:[* TO 2010-04-29T10:34:12Z]) AND (valid_till:[2010-04-29T10:34:12Z TO *])) OR ((*:* -valid_from:[* TO *]) AND (*:* -valid_till:[* TO *]))) I use the empty checks for datasets which do not have a valid from/till range. Is there any way to get this any faster? I can

AW: copyField for dynamicFields

- From: Jan Simon Winkelmann [mailto:winkelm...@newsfactory.de] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:41 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: copyField for dynamicFields Hi, i have the following configured in my schema.xml: dynamicField name=*_i type=text indexed=true stored=false

Strange search behavior

Hi, I'm having some problems understanding why certain search queries don't return any results. I have a field of type text, which is defined like this: fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100 analyzer type=index charFilter

xml error when indexing

Hi, I'm having a strange problem when indexing data through our application. Whenever I post something to the update resource, I get Unexpected character 'a' (code 97) in prolog; expected '' at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [1,1], html head meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;

Solr-JMX/Jetty agentId

-Simon Winkelmann

AW: Solr-JMX/Jetty agentId

2010/2/10 Jan Simon Winkelmann winkelm...@newsfactory.de: I am (still) trying to get JMX to work. I have finally managed to get a Jetty installation running with the right parameters to enable JMX. Now the next problem appeared. I need to get Solr to register ist MBeans with the Jetty

AW: Solr not starting JMX

: My parameters look like this (running the Solr example): : : java -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=6060 : -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false : -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -jar start.jar What implementation/version of java are you

Solr not starting JMX

very much in advance Jan-Simon Winkelmann

AW: AW: Searching for empty fields possible?

I'm not sure, theoretically fields with a null value (php-side) should end up not having the field. But then again i don't think it's relevant just yet. What bugs me is that if I add the -puid:[* TO *], all results for puid:[0 TO *] disappear, even though I am using OR. - operator does not

Searching for empty fields possible?

Hi there, i have a field defined in my schema as follows: field name=puid type=integer indexed=true stored=false required=false / Valid values for the fields are (in theory) any unsigned integer value. Also the field can be empty. My problem is, that if I have (puid:[0 TO *] OR -puid:[* TO *])

AW: Searching for empty fields possible?

bugs me is that if I add the -puid:[* TO *], all results for puid:[0 TO *] disappear, even though I am using OR. Best, Jan On Jan 25, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Jan-Simon Winkelmann wrote: Hi there, i have a field defined in my schema as follows: field name=puid type=integer indexed=true

Dynamically changing the stored-state of a dynamicField

=*_index_stored type=text indexed=true stored=true required=false / Thanks in advance! Jan-Simon Winkelmann