Hi Rajesh,
Have you taked a look on Query Re-Ranking? The idea is a little different of
what you want but i think it should work, essentially you use your normal
search query and then re-rank the top-n documents using a sencod query, this
second query could use the position field to influence y
CloudSolrClient will route all the documents
to the correct leader, leading to better performance. That class
scales nearly linearly in terms of indexing throughput with the
number of shards
FWIW,
Erick
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Jorge Luis Betancourt González
wrote:
> Thanks for
route all the documents
to the correct leader, leading to better performance. That class
scales nearly linearly in terms of indexing throughput with the
number of shards
FWIW,
Erick
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Jorge Luis Betancourt González
wrote:
> Thanks for the prompt reply Shawn
some
methods
On 6/26/2015 2:27 PM, Jorge Luis Betancourt González wrote:
> I'm trying to use the ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient class, that has some methods
> that accept and aditional parameter to indicate the collection, some of this
> methods are add(String collection, SolrInputDoc
Hi all,
I'm trying to use the ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient class, that has some methods
that accept and aditional parameter to indicate the collection, some of this
methods are add(String collection, SolrInputDocument doc), request(SolrRequest,
String collection). With HttpSolrClient this works f
the
doc/field level.
Is this a desired behaviour?
Regards,
- Original Message -----
From: "Jorge Luis Betancourt González"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 11:49:18 PM
Subject: Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: High fieldNorm values causing really odd results
Regarding t
Does a boost field in Solr has any use on the core calculation? For what I can
see in [1] If a boost attribute is used in the doc/field level it my be encoded
in the norm field and then used to boost the specific match in the doc/field.
But I've a schema.xml with a boost field defined and using
Regarding the experiment, sorry If I explained myself in the wrong way, the
indexed document doesn't have 119669 terms have a lot less terms (less than a
1000 terms, I don't have the exact number here now), instead 119669 is the
number of distinct terms reported by luke (Top-terms total in the a
Hi Hoss,
First of all, thank you for your reply.
Sorry for leaving the Solr version out in my previous email, I'm using Solr
4.10.3 running on Centos7, with the following JRE: Oracle Corporation OpenJDK
64-Bit Server VM (1.7.0_75 24.75-b04)
This are the relevant portions of my schema.xml
Hi everyone:
>From the last couple of week I'm noting some really odd results in my Solr
>server, searching for the root cause the one thing I can point out is a very
>high value of the fieldNorm parameter in the score calculation, an snippet of
>the debug info:
{
"match":true,
"value":4
So bottom line you're trying to get the count on distinct values on the
loginName field? At least based on your query "*:*", if this is what you're
after checkout the Stats component, specially the calcDistinct parameter,
although if you expect a really high cardinality in the field this could b
For a project I'm working on, what we do is store the user's query in a
separated core that we also use to provide an autocomplete query functionality,
so far, the frontend app is responsible of sending the query to Solr, meaning:
1. execute the query against our search core and 2. send an updat
sults.
We excluded 'special N' with -id:(1 2 3 ... N) type query. all done on client
side.
Ahmet
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:28 PM, Jorge Luis Betancourt González
wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I got an interesting use case that I'm not sure how to implement, the
idea is that t
Hi all,
Recently I got an interesting use case that I'm not sure how to implement, the
idea is that the client wants a fixed number of documents, let's call it N, to
appear in the top of the results. Let me explain a little we're working with
web documents so the idea is too promote the documen
Perhaps could you use a DocTransformer to convert the unix time field into any
representation you want? You'll need to write a custom DocTransformer but this
is no complex task.
Regards,
- Original Message -
From: "Ahmed Adel"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2
Hi Dan:
Agreed, this question is more Nutch related than Solr ;)
Nutch doesn't send any data into /update/extract request handler, all the text
and metadata extraction happens in Nutch side rather than relying in the
ExtractRequestHandler provided by Solr. Underneath Nutch use Tika the same
te
Hi all,
Recently I got an interesting use case that I'm not sure how to implement, the
idea is that the client wants a fixed number of documents, let's call it N, to
appear in the top of the results. Let me explain a little we're working with
web documents so the idea is too promote the documen
, January 23, 2015 8:26:48 AM
Subject: RE: Avoiding wildcard queries using edismax query parser
Here's a Jira for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3031
I've attached a patch there that might be useful for you.
-Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Jorge Luis Betanco
uery parser
The dismax query parser does not support wildcards. It is designed to be
simpler.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Jorge Luis Betancourt González <
jlbetanco...@uci.cu> wrote:
> I was also suspecting something like that, the odd thing was that the with
> the
;
To: "solr-user"
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 4:46:08 PM
Subject: Re: Avoiding wildcard queries using edismax query parser
I suspect the special characters get caught before the analyzer chains.
But what about pre-pending a custom search components?
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up
Hello all,
Currently we are using edismax query parser in an internal application, we've
detected that some wildcard queries including "*" are causing some performance
issues and for this particular case we're not interested in allowing any user
to request all the indexed documents.
This coul
I think this sounds like grouping results by field?
You should enable groups by adding &group=true&group.field=YOURFIELD to test
this feature.
For each unique value of the field specified in group.field, Solr returns a
docList with the *top scoring document*. In the docList you can see the total
This is the full output? try verbose I had an issue with the same library in my
case I was downloading from a local nexus mirror but the problem was with a bad
checksum, I figured this out with the ant -verbose compile command. Disabling
the checksum check for my local nexus and got it working j
I remember a talk by CareerBuilder whe they wrote an API using the approach
explained by Alexandre and they got really good results.
- Original Message -
From: "Anurag Sharma"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2014 7:58:48 AM
Subject: Re: How to dynamically crea
Hi all:
>From the description of the StandardTokenizer, it should Recognizes Internet
>domain names and email addresses and preserves them as a single token, which
>works great, but I've detected that in cases like this:
socks25.domain.com it outputs 2 tokens: socks25 | domain.com
if the URL d
Are you going to use the values stored on Solr to display the data in HTML? For
searching purposes I suggest to delete all the HTML tags, and store the plain
text, for this you could use the HTMLStripCharFilterFactory char filter, this
will "clean" your content and only pass the actual text whic
Although this looks like a nice & simple addition to the web interface.
- Original Message -
From: "Ramzi Alqrainy"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 3:18:26 PM
Subject: Re: Clear Solr Admin Interface Logging page's logs
Yes sure, if you use jetty containe
Maybe you could use copyField to populate one field with the values (fields)
that you like to use for suggestions, then you could search only on this field
and filter by any other field in your schema, and take advantage on the
EdgeNGramFilter placed in the new search field.
Regards,
- Ori
I believe some of this statistics function that you're trying to use are
precent in facets.
- Original Message -
From: "nabil Kouici"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 5:57:27 AM
Subject: Analytics component
Hi All,
I'm trying to use Solr to do some ana
One good thing about kelvin it's more a programmatic task, so you could execute
the scripts after a few changes/deployment and get a general idea if the new
changes has impacted into the search experience; yeah sure the changing catalog
it's still a problem but I kind of like to be able to execu
I would love to see some proxy-like application implemented in go (partly for
my desire of having time to check out go).
- Original Message -
From: "Shawn Heisey"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:38:34 AM
Subject: Re: Solr middle-ware?
On 1/22/2014 12
In a custom application we have, we use a separated core (under Solr 3.6.1) to
store the queries used by the users and then provide the autocomplete feauture.
In our case we need to filter some phrases, that we don't need to be suggested
to the users. I build a custom UpdateRequestProcessor to i
With custom UpdateRequestProcessor this would be doable, but depending on when
this event will be listened, perhaps Otis is right.
- Original Message -
From: "Utkarsh Sengar"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 7:29:40 PM
Subject: Re: Trigger event on change o
Right now we have a custom use case: Basically we are using a separated solr
core to store/suggest queries made by our users in our frontend app (writtern y
Symfony2+Solarium). So basically each time a user hits our search box the query
goes into this particular core. The thing is that there are
Currently I've the following Update Request Processor chain to prevent indexing
very similar text items into a core dedicated to store queries that our users
put into the web interface of our system.
true
false
signature
textsuggest,textng
org.apache.solr.upd
35 matches
Mail list logo
