From memory, if you use UniqFieldsUpdateProcessor after
DistributedUpdateProcessor, then you will be filtering on the set [1,
2, 3, 2].
*updateRequestProcessorChain name=uniq-fields*
*processor
class=solr.DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory/ *
* processor
You can get the summed value, 13, if you add a processor after
DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory in the URP chain. Then one possibility
would be to clone this value to another field, such as field_b, and run
other processors on that field.
Or for something more customized, you can use
the
that will run after
DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory?
Thank you very much.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Nigl [mailto:matthew.n...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 12:10 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: suggestion for new custom atomic update
You can
OR
...)/query/delete. Since there are many documents to delete, you would
want to hold off committing until the end.
On 11 October 2014 02:34, Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Matthew Nigl matthew.n...@gmail.com
wrote:
But I get the same response
Hi Aaron,
You would need to set 'path' in the options array when you create a
SolrClient.
http://php.net/manual/en/solrclient.construct.php
Regards,
Matt
On 15 October 2014 19:31, Aaron Lewis the.warl0ck.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm using PHP client here:
Hi Aaron,
I do not believe that there is direct support for atomic updates with this
API. Other libraries such as Solarium do support this.
However, one option is that you could generate the atomic update XML in
code and send it via a raw request:
http://php.net/manual/en/solrclient.request.php
I was going to say that the below should do what you are asking:
deletequery{!join from=docid_s
to=foreign_key_docid_s}(message_state_ts:[* TO 2014-10-05T00:00:00Z} AND
message_state_ts:{2014-10-01T00:00:00Z TO *])/query/delete
But I get the same response as in
Hi,
I use various ID fields as the keys for various ExternalFileField fields,
and I have noticed that I will sometimes get the following error:
ERROR org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter û
null:java.lang.NullPointerException
at
Thanks Markus. I initially interpreted the line It's OK to have a keyField
value that can't be found in the index as meaning that the key field value
in the external file does not have to exist as a term in the index.
On 8 October 2014 23:56, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
in the index get
returned as 499.99 due to the rounding error when it is converted from AUD
- USD - AUD.
If I am using any of the above incorrectly then please let me know.
Regards,
Matt
On 29 August 2014 14:54, Matthew Nigl matthew.nigl+s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have an issue where
Hi all,
I have an issue where the currency function is not returning the expected
value in particular scenarios. I believe my config is correct and I am able
to replicate the issue over a few machines.
The issue occurs when converting the value of a currency field from the
source currency into a
Hi all,
I have an issue where the currency function is not returning the expected
value in particular scenarios. I believe my config is correct and I am able
to replicate the issue over a few machines.
The issue occurs when converting the value of a currency field from the
source currency into a
12 matches
Mail list logo
