RE: Solr 5.5 | Field boosting not working as per expectation

2016-06-22 Thread Megha Bhandari
ve to tell it to... Best, Erick On Jun 21, 2016 2:51 AM, "Megha Bhandari" wrote: > We have the following in solrconfig.xml, nothing related to timestamp > > > > edismax > > metatag.keywords^90.1 metatag.description^50.1 &

RE: Solr 5.5 | Field boosting not working as per expectation

2016-06-21 Thread Megha Bhandari
27;t have some unexpectedly-complex biasing formula hiding in solrconfig.xml parameter. Regards, Alex. Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates: http://www.solr-start.com/ On 21 June 2016 at 16:53, Megha Bhandari wrote: > After further investigation we have foun

RE: Solr 5.5 | Field boosting not working as per expectation

2016-06-20 Thread Megha Bhandari
. As per our understanding field boosting should take precedence. Thanks in advance for any inputs you can give. -Original Message- From: Megha Bhandari [mailto:mbhanda...@sapient.com] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 4:37 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solr 5.5 | Field boosting

Solr 5.5 | Field boosting not working as per expectation

2016-06-20 Thread Megha Bhandari
Hi Problem statement : metatag.description field has highest boost and documents with a match in this field should come first. However Silver-Choice-5000-E.pdf comes before /contact-us/florida even though the search term matches more fields in the /contact-us/florida page. In Silver-Choice-5000

RE: Edismax field boosting behavior for null values

2016-05-11 Thread Megha Bhandari
the query debug results for both configurations if required. Thanks for any help in understanding this. -Original Message----- From: Megha Bhandari [mailto:mbhanda...@sapient.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:10 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Edismax field boosting behav

Edismax field boosting behavior for null values

2016-05-11 Thread Megha Bhandari
Hi Can someone help us understand how null values affect boosting. Say we have field_1 (with boost ^10.1) and field_2 (with boost ^9.1). We search for foo. Document A has field_1(foo match) and field_2(empty) and Document B has field_2(foo match) but no field_1. As per our understanding the re

RE: Solr edismax field boosting

2016-05-10 Thread Megha Bhandari
his is the default in the version of solr you are using. Nick On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Megha Bhandari wrote: > Thanks Nick, got the response formatted. We are using Solr 5.5. > Not able to understand why it is ignoring the boosts completely. What > configuration is being mi

RE: Solr edismax field boosting

2016-05-10 Thread Megha Bhandari
t; "lang":"en", > "metatag.keywords":",", > "_version_":1533871839731777536, > "host":"localhost", > "url":" > http://localhost:4503/content/uhcdotcom/en/home/waysin/poc/Foo-cu

RE: Solr edismax field boosting

2016-05-09 Thread Megha Bhandari
o in 4) [], result of:\n 0.5481102 = score(doc=4,freq=1.0 = termFreq=1.0\n), product of:\n 0.44183275 = idf(docFreq=4, docCount=6)\n 1.2405376 = tfNorm, computed from:\n1.0 = termFreq=1.0\n1.2 = parameter k1\n 0.75 = parameter b\n121.64 = avgFie

RE: Solr edismax field boosting

2016-05-09 Thread Megha Bhandari
t;ExtendedDismaxQParser", "altquerystring":null, "boost_queries":null, "parsed_boost_queries":[], "boostfuncs":null, "timing":{ "time":12.0, "prepare":{ "time":1.0, &q

Solr edismax field boosting

2016-05-09 Thread Megha Bhandari
Hi We are trying to boost certain fields with relevancy. However we are not getting results as per expectation. Below is the configuration in solr-config.xml. Even though the title field has a lesser boost than metatag.description results for title field are coming higher. We even created test