What is analysis.jsp showing to you, when you query the words?
Due to stemming the input, there could be the mistake.
What happens, if you search for "aviation" without wildcards?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Problem-with-text-field-in-Solr-tp27175346p27175827.html
Sen
Hello,
I have searched the wiki and the mailing-lists, but I can't find any
postings for the following training-use cases.
First:
I want to create a Term Dictionary, which I can response to my client. The
client should be able to manipulate this response in any way he wants - so I
really need a
riginal query - how can I do that?
Erik Hatcher-4 wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 11, 2010, at 7:33 AM, MitchK wrote:
>> Is the UpdateProcessor something that comes froms Lucene itself or
>> from
>> Solr?
>
> It's at the Solr level -
> <
Hello Hossman,
sorry for my late response.
For this specific case, you are right. It makes more sense to do such work
"on the fly".
However, I am only testing at the moment, what one can do with Solr and what
not.
Is the UpdateProcessor something that comes froms Lucene itself or from
Solr?
Th
use case you're trying to implement
> or is this mostly theoretical?
>
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:08 PM, MitchK wrote:
>
>>
>> The difference between stored and indexed is clear now.
>>
>> You are right, if you are responsing only to
dex it in f1
> but do NOT store it in f1. Store it in f2
> but do NOT index it in f2.
> 2> take that same data, index AND store
> it in f3.
>
> <1> is almost entirely equivalent to <2>
> in terms of index resources.
>
> Practically though,
ields?
ryantxu wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:50 AM, MitchK wrote:
>
>>
>> Eric,
>>
>> you mean, everything is okay, but I do not see it?
>>
>>>> Internally for searching the analysis takes place and writes to the
>>>> index in an
thinking going on implementing it such that analyzed
> output is stored.
>
> You can, however, use the analysis request handler componentry to get
> analyzed stuff back as you see it in analysis.jsp on a per-document or
> per-field text basis - if you're looking to
indexed = true. My language was a
little bit tricky ;).
ryantxu wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 6, 2010, at 3:48 PM, MitchK wrote:
>
>>
>> I have tested a lot and all the time I thought I set wrong options
>> for my
>> custom analyzer.
>> Well, I have noticed t
aved data afterwards.
Thank you.
Mitch
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> <<>>
>
> How do you know this? Because it's highly unlikely that SOLR
> is completely broken on that level.....
>
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:48 PM, MitchK wrote:
>
I have tested a lot and all the time I thought I set wrong options for my
custom analyzer.
Well, I have noticed that Solr isn't using ANY analyzer, filter or stemmer.
It seems like it only stores the original input.
I am using the example-configuration of the current Solr 1.4 release.
What's wron
Hello community,
I wrote another mail today, but I think something goes wrong (I can't find
my post in the mailinglist) - if not, I am sorry for posting a "doublepost"
- I am using a maillist for the first time.
I have created a custom analyzer, which contains on a LowerCaseTokenizer, a
StopFilt
201 - 212 of 212 matches
Mail list logo