Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Limit Solr search to number of character/words (without changing index)

Hi Alessandro, Thanks for making it more clear. As I mentioned I do not want to change my index (mentioned in subject) for the feature I requested. search query will have to look for first 100 characters indexed in same XYZ field. " How can I achieve this without changing index? I want at

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Limit Solr search to number of character/words (without changing index)

This is static, that is the field is truncated at index time so you > can't change the values per-request. > > Best, > Erick > > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 6:32 AM, Muhammad Zahid Iqbal > <zahid.iq...@northbaysolutions.net> wrote: > > Thanks. > > > > I d

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Limit Solr search to number of character/words (without changing index)

Thanks. I do not want to search if the query is shorter than a certain number of terms/characters. For example, I have a 10MB document indexed in Solr what I want is to search query in first 1MB content of that indexed document. Any workaround e.g .can I send query to Solr to look for only 1MB

***UNCHECKED*** Limit Solr search to number of character/words (without changing index)

Hi All, Is there any way I can restrict Solr search query to look for specified number of characters/words (for only searching purposes not for highlighting) *For example:* *Indexed content:* *I am a man of my words I am a lazy man...* Search to consider only below mentioned (words=7

Re: Indexing word with plus sign

Hi, Before applying tokenizer, you can replace your special symbols with some phrase to preserve it and after tokenized you can replace it back. For example: Thanks, Zahid iqbal On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Fundera Developer < funderadevelo...@outlook.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am a

Solr JOIN - Self join within core not working

Hi, I have a Solr instance setup with one core named as Book (contains total 100 records and a field isprimary:1 has 50 records) When I querying, bring me accurate results (50), its simple I know: http://localhost:7161/solr/Book/select?q=%3A=IsPrimary%3A1=10=xml=true But When I query like this

Re: slow updates/searches

Rallavagu, Did you find any solution to slow searches? As far as I know jetty container default configuration is bit slow for large production environment. On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > If both queries _and_ updates are slow, it's hard to see

Re: How to set NOT clause on Date range query in Solr

Intend your question properly so that someone can understand. I am out! On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Sandeep Khanzode < sandeep_khanz...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > Have been trying to understand this for a while ...How can I specify NOT > clause in the following query?{!field f=schedule >

Re: Solr Special Character Search

Hi, To handled special characters, either you need to create your own custom filter factory or need to replace already specified filter factory with some other, if you are using StandardFilterFactory. On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > What's

Re: Stopping Solr JVM on OOM

You can use ping functionality by setting time-out that suits for your container/web-apps. If its not working then you can restart your container. Cheers! If any other solution I am interested too. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:19 AM, CP Mishra wrote: > Solr & Lucene dev folks

Re: Is it possible to sort on a BooleanField?

Please share your schema. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote: > Looks like not. I get to see > 'can not sort on a field which is neither indexed nor has doc values: > ' > > - Clemens >

Re: Upgrading from 4.x to 5.x

Hi daniel You need to update your config/scehma file on the path like '...\solr-dir\server\solr' . When you are done then you can update your index path in solrconfig.xml. I hope you got it. Best, Zahid On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Miller wrote: > Thank you -

Re: Upgrading from 4.x to 5.x

, which may have worked...I'm not certain if the > search results came from solr or my imap server manually searching. > > I'm sure I'm overcomplicating things - just not seeing the obvious. > > Daniel > > > > > On November 19, 2015 1:09:07 AM Muhammad Zahid Iqbal &