Hi,
I have an index with 3M docs.
Each doc has a field calld version_uuid.
I want to delete all docs that theire version_uuid is other
then 'e04534e2-28db-4420-a5f3-300477872c11' (for example :-))
This is the query I submit to the SolrServer object using the deleteByQuery
method:
NOT
Hi David,
Thank you very much - that did the trick :-)
Noam.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Delete-by-query-tp27306968p27307336.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Mei
Thank you very much - looks good :-)
Noam.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Choosing-what-document-to-return.-tp27259310p27293083.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Guys,
I'll start by thanking every one for an amazing search engine!
What am I trying to do? Basically what I need is the ability to do some kind
of switch or an if-else flow based on the field value and a parameter
that I will pass using the query string. The result will be documents that
Hi All (Erick, David...)
Thanks for replying.
Let me try to elaborate:
- Each document holds a string value called name, an int parameter called
payout a parameter called network_id.
- Name can be any string.
- Payout can be any number.
- Network_id can be one of maximum 20 available values
Hi Mei,
The problem is that I need to do a calculation on the field.
So I assumed I need to extend one of the classes in order to be able to do a
calculation on a field with an if-else capabailities.
Don't I?
Noam.
--
View this message in context:
Hi Mei,
I replyed to you directlly by mistake - so here is the message again -
allmost the same ;-)
I think I'm getting it now :-)
Let's take your suggestion:
name:abc AND ((network_id:network1 AND payout:[minval TO *]) OR
-network_id:network1)
What I need is not the value of payout but, 50%
Hi Mei,
You are right.
Suddenlly it looks clear - is it too late? :-)
Let me look at it again tomorrow.
Thank you very much :-)
Noam.
Wangsheng Mei wrote:
2010/1/22 Noam G. noam...@gmail.com
Hi Mei,
I replyed to you directlly by mistake - so here is the message again -
allmost