Thanks Yonik. It was very useful.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Preetam Raoblogathan@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
If I have documents of type a, b and c but when I sort by some criteria,
lets say date,
can I
Hi,
If I have documents of type a, b and c but when I sort by some criteria,
lets say date,
can I make documents of kind c always appear at the bottom ?
So effectively I want one kind of records always appear at the bottom since
they don't have valid data,
whether sort is ascending or descending;
I don't have much idea on performance of these many fqs, since I have
usually used very small number of fqs. But passing my thoughts hoping it
might help. (since I did not see any response :-)
a) the filter cache size needs to be more, so that fqs can be cached. If a
fq is not in cache, AFAIK,
hi,
try using faceted search,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
something like facet=truefacet.query=title:(web2.0 OR ajax)
facet.query - gives the number of matching documents for a query.
You can run the examples in the above link and see how it works..
You can also try using
add a debugQuery=true
parameter to check the actual parsed query.
-Chris
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:07:43 +0530
Preetam Rao [EMAIL
If I understand the question correctly, you can provide init params, default
params and invariant params in the appropriate request handler section in
solrconfig.xml.
So you can create a standard request handler with name dismaxL, whose
defType is dismax and set all parameters in defaults section.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Preetam Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If I understand the question correctly, you can provide init params,
default
params and invariant params in the appropriate request handler section in
solrconfig.xml.
So you can create a standard request handler with name
..
---
preetam
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Preetam Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I see that a QParser takes local params (those given via {!...} )as well as
request params. It sets the lookup chain as local followed be request
params. AFAIK, the request param lookup chain is set up
Hi,
Apologies if you are receiving it second time...having tough time with mail
server..
I take a user entered query as it is and run it with dismax query handler.
The documents fields have been filled from structured data, where different
fields have different attributes like number of beds,
PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jul 15, 2008, at 4:45 AM, Preetam Rao wrote:
What are your thoughts on having one more request handler like dismax, but
which uses a sub-phrase query instead of dismax query ?
It'd be better to just implement a QParser(Plugin) such that the
StandardRequestHandler can use
Hi Matt,
Other than applying one more fq, is everything else remains same between the
two queries, like q and all other parameters ?
My understanding is that, fq is an intersection on the set of results
returned from q. So it should always be a subset of results returned from q.
So if one uses
. (followed by 9
docs)
-Matt
Preetam Rao wrote:
Hi Matt,
Other than applying one more fq, is everything else remains same between
the
two queries, like q and all other parameters ?
My understanding is that, fq is an intersection on the set of results
returned from q. So
if you *do* sort by something other than score:
http://www.nabble.com/try-setting-useFilterForSortedQuery-to-false-td7822871.html#a7822871
Cheers,
Chris
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Preetam Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since we do not sort the results, the sort will be by score which
Hi,
Since we plan to share the same box among multiple solr instances on a 16gb
RAM multi core box, Need to estimate how much memory we need for our
application.
The index size is on disk 2.4G with close to 3 million documents. The plan
is to use dismax query with some fqs.
Since we do not sort
the performance boost needed.
If I misread the thread, please chime in - but it seems having enough
RAM is the key to performance.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Preetam Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Since we plan to share the same box among multiple solr instances on a
16gb
RAM multi
set the solr home folder such that-
If you are using jndi name for solr.home or command line argument for
solr.home, then it will look for conf and lib folders under that folder.
If you are not using jndi name, then it looks for solr/conf and solr/lib
folders under current directory which is the
16 matches
Mail list logo
