chment
> from your system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its
> subsidiaries do not accept liability for any omissions or errors in this
> message which may arise as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages
> resulting from any unauthorized changes of the content of this message and
> any attachment thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its
> subsidiaries do not guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does
> not accept liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted
> therewith.
>
> Click http://www.emdgroup.com/disclaimer to access the German, French,
> Spanish and Portuguese versions of this disclaimer.
>
--
Saurabh Sethi
Principal Engineer I | Engineering
generateWordParts="0"
>splitOnCaseChange="0"
>splitOnNumerics="1"
> generateNumberParts="0"
>catenateWords="0"
>catenateNumbers="1"
>
up.com/disclaimer to access the German, French,
> Spanish and Portuguese versions of this disclaimer.
>
--
Saurabh Sethi
Principal Engineer I | Engineering
I have a question in terms of how solr/lucene will lookup terms from
postings list for the below two queries:
1. a*
2. a*gh
My understanding is that for first, it will get all terms starting with 'a'
and issue query on those terms.
For second, it will again get all terms starting with 'a', then r
Typo in previous response. Following is correct:
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Saurabh Sethi
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Susheel Kumar
> wrote:
>
>> and how do you create the field? Share the the line where you are
>> creating
>>
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Susheel Kumar
wrote:
> and how do you create the field? Share the the line where you are creating
> the above field1
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Saurabh Sethi
> wrote:
>
> > Do we need to store boolean field in order to
Do we need to store boolean field in order to query it?
The query I am running is "field1:true"
With the following field type, where "stored=false", query returns 0 result.
But if I change stored to "true", same query works.
Thanks,
Saurabh
siness functionality you
> are looking to achieve.
>
> Thanks,
> Susheel
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Saurabh Sethi >
> wrote:
>
> > Number of dynamic fields will be in thousands (millions of users +
> > thousands of events shared between subsets of u
1_val2
> dyn4_val67
>
> Only really works with string fields of course.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Saurabh Sethi
> wrote:
> > We have two requirements:
> >
> > 1. Indexing and storing event id and its timestamp.
> > 2.
We have two requirements:
1. Indexing and storing event id and its timestamp.
2. Indexing and storing custom field name and value. The fields can be of
any type, but for now lets say they are of types string, date and number.
The events and custom fields for any solr document can easily be in
hun
Hi,
We have a fieldType specified for date. Earlier it was using TrieDateField
and we changed it to DatePointField.
Here are the fields used in the query and one of them uses the dateType:
The following query was returning correct results when the field type was
Trie but not with Point:
11 matches
Mail list logo
