No, this is on a test system that is still smallish, approx 100,000
records of dummy data with Wikipedia articles as content at the time
this occurred.
I wouldn't expect rebuilding the index to stall the entire JVM, that
seems excessive...
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Wed
seException: The
server localhost failed to respond.
Any ideas? Anything else we should look at to help diagnose?
---
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
rocess input
through a chain, it sends the original content to each field and
therefore analysis is totally independent.
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
I know it seems like my problem may not be the same as the original
poster, but in investigating this, I did find this Jetty issue that
may be related: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-1377
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Stephen Duncan Jr
wrote
) [0x0061f000]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
- waiting on <0x17e5ea80> (a java.lang.Object)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:485)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.join(QueuedThreadPool.java:382)
- locked <0x17e5ea80> (a java.lang.Object)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.join(Server.java:399)
at .App.main(App.java:42)
Locked ownable synchronizers:
- None
"VM Thread" prio=10 tid=0x46cd1000 nid=0x1a74 runnable
"VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=10 tid=0x46cfac00 nid=0x1430 waiting on
condition
JNI global references: 1665
---
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
identify a useful technique for taking advantage of it to
share configuration in Solr. My hope was that someone who had used it
successfully could indicate either something I missed about how to
make it work, or a useful pattern for working within the limitations
of the available functionality.
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
Does anyone use XInclude? I'd like to hear about any successful usage at all.
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
ave of how their using XInclude
for configuration sharing.
Thanks,
Stephen
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Stephen Duncan Jr
wrote:
> I've spent some time looking at various conversations on this problem,
> but I can't find a solution that w
a cumbersome way to list out each child element by
index number using the element scheme, which I assume works, but is
way to cumbersome to use.
Does any have any success using XInclude to include more than one
element? I'm open to any and all approaches to having
partially-common configuration between cores.
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
2) at the preference of others who don't want me to deploy a
"modified" war to our Maven repo.
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
That would improve things for recent documents, but documents that were
close to each other, but a long time from NOW, would still have very small
differences that would be susceptible to rounding errors that can cause
results to get shuffled.
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Tue
No, the problem is that, due to rounding, sometimes the docs ARE considered
ties, and therefore the secondary sort is used, but sometimes they don't
round to exactly equal, and the tiebreaker isn't used, and the results get
shuffled.
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On T
, and
miss out on some of the docs in the overall set. It's not something
negligible that I can ignore. I either have to come up with a fix for this,
or get rid of the boost function altogether.
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Markus Jelsma
wr
16e-11,1,1)
Is this a problem anyone has faced and solved? Anyone have suggested
solutions, other than indexing a copy of the date field that's rounded to
the hour?
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
Set facet.limit to -1 (globally or for that field). That will return all
the facets, in lexicographical order.
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Em wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> I got a little issue with sorting a FacetQuery.
>
> Cu
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Stephen Duncan Jr wrote:
> I'm prototyping using StreamingUpdateSolrServer. I want to send a commit
> (or optimize) after I'm done adding all of my docs, rather than wait for the
> autoCommit to kick in. However, since StreamingUpdateSo
.0 and the latest
release candidate for Solr 1.4.1. Has anybody else had this experience?
Should I file a bug on blockUntilFinished()?
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> What would it be?
>
Near real-time search & faceting.
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
t,
not "completely overriding the default scoring", but I think the impact is
basically the same, as was satisfied it was good enough.
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
> > seems like the war artifact isn't published. Is there a reason for this
> or
> > is it published elsewhere ?
> >
> >
> The war is not published as a maven artifact. Why would you need the war in
> maven?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Stephen Duncan Jr wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Chris Hostetter > wrote:
>
>>
>> oh man, so you were parsing the Stored field values of every matching doc
>> at query time? ouch.
>>
>> Assuming i'm unde
; then write yourself
> a simple little custom QParser that generates a BoostingTermQuery on your
> field.
>
> should be a lot simpler to implement then the Query you are describing,
> and much faster.
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
Thanks. I finally got around to looking at this again today and was looking
at a similar path, so I appreciate the confirmation.
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
ent. Then we turned the space-separated
strings into arrays, searched the id array for the index of the desired id,
then scanned the score array for the matching score, and returned.
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
your query, and have 0 rows returned. That shouldn't really be
any more expensive than faceting on any other query.
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
ster it as the default for FacetComponent in
> : > > > solrconfig.xml?
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
My experience (which is on a trunk build from a few weeks back of Solr 2.4),
is that changing the default parser for the handler does NOT change it for
facet.query. I had expected it would, but was disappointed.
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
ser
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/custom?q=string_in_my_custom_language
>
> On 9/10/09, Stephen Duncan Jr wrote:
> > If using {!type=customparser} is the only way now, should I file an issue
> to
> > make the default configurable?
> >
> > --
> > Stephe
If using {!type=customparser} is the only way now, should I file an issue to
make the default configurable?
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Stephen Duncan Jr wrote:
> We have a custom query parser plugin registered as the default for
> se
t I'd
rather register it in the config that make my code send that and strip it
off on every facet query.
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
date faceting
to avoid this problem?
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
e sense to
>> increase the filterCache size so it matches more or less the number
>> of different possible values for the faceted fields? Would that not
>> make the memory usage explode?
>>
>> Thanks for your help !
>>
>> --
>> Jerome Eteve.
>>
>> Chat with me live at http://www.eteve.net
>>
>> jer...@eteve.net
>>
>
>
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
t just return it.
>
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
> Stephen Duncan Jr wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Stephen Duncan Jr <
>> stephen.dun...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>&g
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Stephen Duncan Jr wrote:
> This is with trunk for Solr 1.4. It happened both with a build from 1 week
> ago as well as with a build from today, so I'm not sure if it's something
> recent, or even if it would happen on Solr 1.3 or not. Here&
in our
testing phase (including one occassion where the problem was triggered while
warming a searcher during commit, and the commit never completed).
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Stephen Duncan
> Jr wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Yonik Seeley >wrote:
> > Hmm, that's a hard thing to sell to the user and my boss, as it makes the
> > query time
n all the fields
that are likely to risk crossing this line. Should I be looking at the
termInstances property on the fields that are displayed in the
FieldValueCache on the stats page, and figuring those on the order of 10
million are likely to grow past the limit?
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Stephen Duncan
> Jr wrote:
> > I have a couple more questions on the FieldValueCache. I see that the
> > number of items in the cache is basically the number of multi-valued
> fields
any results and fails to populate the
cache..). If the warming query might now take 25 seconds (maybe more for
more documents), I guess we might need to decrease the autocommit rate to
cut down on chance of overlapping warmers?
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
d
for. Any pointers?
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Stephen Duncan Jr wrote:
>
> What's the effect of showItems attribute on the fieldValueCache in Solr
>> 1.4?
>>
>
> Just outputs details of the last accessed items fr
What's the effect of showItems attribute on the fieldValueCache in Solr 1.4?
--
Stephen Duncan Jr
www.stephenduncanjr.com
40 matches
Mail list logo
