Hi all,
Does anyone know the Solr (lucene)spatial search time complexity, such as
geofilt on LatLonType fields? Is it logN?
Thanks!
TJ
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spatial-Search-response-time-complexity-tp4012801.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Hi Jack,
Thanks for your reply. I did not specify dismax when query with highlighting
enabled: q=text:G-Moneyhl=truehl.fl=*, that was the whole query string I
sent. What puzzled me is that the string field cr_firstname was copied
to text, but it was not highlighted. But if I use
I am also working on highlighting. I don't think so. And the ids in the
highlighting part are the ids of the docs retrieved.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlight-feature-tp3983875p3983887.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks, Jack! I think you are right. But I also copied cr_firstname to text,
I assumed Solr would highlight cr_firstname if there is a match. I guess the
only solution is to copy all field to another field which is not tokenized.
Yes, it is firstname, good catch!
Thanks again!
TJ
--
View this
Dear all,
I queried Solr (3.5) with this: q=text:G-Moneyhl=truehl.fl=*, where text
is a text field and all the other fields were copied to it. I got three
records returned, however, only one field (also text field) was
highlighted:
lst name=highlighting
lst name=cr_149107
arr name=cr_name