performance using
compressed fields?
Thanks a lot for your ideas and answers!
Regards
Uwe
--
Uwe Clement
Software Architect
Project Manager
___ |X__
X|
eXXcellent solutions gmbh
Beim Alten Fritz 2
D-89075 Ulm
In 3.6.1 i also got back a Date insance, now from 4.0 I receive also a
String.
I don't like this, but I adapted my software now.
Is there no way to change this behavior in the config?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. Januar
Thanks erick,
the main reason why i want to use atomic updates is, to increase updating
existing kind of large documents.
So if under to cover, everything is the same (loading the whole doc,
updating, re-index the whole doc) it is not interesting for me anymore.
What is the best the most
| Atomic Updates | How works exactly?
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Uwe Clement uwe.clem...@exxcellent.de
wrote:
What is the best the most performant way to update a large document?
That *is* the best way to update a large document that we currently have.
Although it re-indexes under
