Re: Got parseException when search keyword AND on a text field

Otis, Thanks for the reply. Is there a list of words that have special meaning? Thanks Xuesong Re: Got parseException when search keyword AND on a text field Otis Gospodnetic Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:39:45 -0700 Xuesong, AND has a special meaning - it is a boolean AND when capitalized. That

Got parseException when search keyword AND on a text field

Hi, I got the following error when search keyword AND on a text field. I checked stopwords.txt, it has an entry for word and.(case insensitive), but it seems not work for word AND. Does any one know how to fix this problem? Thanks Xuesong

RE: range query failed if highlight is used

Thanks Hoss, I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-491 to check this bug The reason I need to highlight the numeric or data field is I have to loop through the search result to apply role permission check on those fields. If the searcher doesn't have permission to see the

range query failed if highlight is used

Hi, I'm using solr1.3 nightly build. I defined a sint field bookCount. When I query on this field, it works fine without highlight. However if I turn on highlight(hl=truehl.fl=bookCount), it failed due to the error below. Does anyone know if this is a bug? If I change the type to integer, the

facet and field collapse

Hi, there, Our index stores employee working history information. For each employee, there could be multiple index records. The requirement is: 1. The search result should be sorted on score. 2. Each employee should only appear once regardless how many match are found. 3. The

one query or multiple queries

Hi, there, I have a user index(each user has a unique index record). If I want to search 10 users, should I run 10 queries or 1 query with multiple user ids? Is there any performance difference? Thanks Xuesong

always fail to update the first time after I restart the server

Hi, I noticed the first index update after I restart my jboss server always fail with the exception below. Any update after that works fine. Does anyone know what the problem is? The solr version I'm using is solr1.2 Thanks Xuesong 2007-08-09 11:41:44,559 ERROR [STDERR] Aug 9, 2007 11:41:44 AM

RE: Updating index on cluster

On your slave, you can run snappuller to get the latest snapshot from master(generated by snapshooter), then run snapinstaller to notify solr to use the updated index. -Original Message- From: Matt Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 12:12 PM To:

RE: multiple slaves on the same box

@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: multiple slaves on the same box Xuesong Luo wrote: Hi, there, We have one master server and multiple slave servers. The multiple slave servers can be run either on the same box or different boxes. For slaves on the same box, is there any best practice that they should use

RE: wildcard searches standard request handler

That's also what I did in my code, I search for * or ?, if exists, lowercase the query string. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 12:13 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: wildcard

RE: distribution scripts on Solaris

You can use perl to get the sec, an example is: rsyncEndSec=`perl -e print time;` -Original Message- From: Bill Au [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 8:40 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: distribution scripts on Solaris I am working on bug SOLR-282:

webapp_name in commit and optimize

Hi, I deployed solr web app with a different name then found commit does not work. When I looked at the code, I saw variable webapp_name is populated but not used. It always uses solr as the web app name. optimize has the same problem. Is this a known bug? Wrong: rs=`curl

RE: webapp_name in commit and optimize

: webapp_name in commit and optimize It defaults to solr, are you specifying your webapp name when you invoke the program? usage: $prog [-h hostname] [-p port] [-u username] [-U url] [-v] [-V] ... -w specify name of Solr webapp (defaults to solr) Xuesong Luo wrote: I'm

RE: webapp_name in commit and optimize

Hmmm, it's different than the one I got, we may just installed the search.war from 1.2 but forgot to update the bin. Thanks Xuesong -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 10:44 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE:

RE: webapp_name in commit and optimize

I'm using 1.2, yes, it adds a webapps_name option, but it's never used in the commit/optimizer. -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 10:32 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: webapp_name in commit and optimize : but

autocommit not working for delete?

Hi, I set up solr to autocommit each minute. It works well if I sent an add request, but it does not work for delete, nothing happened after 1 minute. Is this a bug or a designed behavior? Thanks Xuesong autoCommit maxTime6/maxTime /autoCommit

RE: autocommit not working for delete?

Xuesong Luo wrote: Hi, I set up solr to autocommit each minute. It works well if I sent an add request, but it does not work for delete, nothing happened after 1 minute. Is this a bug or a designed behavior? Thanks Xuesong autoCommit maxTime6/maxTime /autoCommit

RE: Solr indexing

2) yes. -Original Message- From: niraj tulachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 3:09 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solr indexing Hi all, I have successfully implemented the Solr so far but there are couple of questions I want the solr user to

Not enough space

I set up solr1.2 to run snapshooter each time after a commit/optimize. It worked fine for a while, but later I got the error message below after sending the commit request. It seems jboss(4.0.GA) had problem running snapshooter. The index size is 290m, the file system that solr data directory is

RE: snapshooter no go

I got another problem: solr is able to find snapshooter but didn't generate any snapshot files after I updated the index. I checked the log, everything looks fine, then I run snapshooter from command line. It failed because solaris doesn't support -l option when using cp command. I'm trying to

RE: snapshooter no go

Just found I can use ln dir1/* dir2 to make hard link for all files in dir1 to dir2. -Original Message- From: Xuesong Luo Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 11:17 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: snapshooter no go I got another problem: solr is able to find snapshooter

RE: snapshooter no go

Subject: Re: snapshooter no go Maybe you can open an issue in JIRA with your solution, so Bill Au Co. can fix snappuller. Otis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share - Original Message From: Xuesong Luo [EMAIL

RE: snapshooter no go

I got similar problems, tried both default setting solr/bin and full path /export/home/jboss/jboss-4.0.5.GA/bin/solr/bin, neither works. I'm using 1.2. 2007-06-27 14:10:03,907 ERROR [STDERR] Jun 27, 2007 2:10:03 PM org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2 commit INFO: start

RE: snapshooter no go

I thought I had to use the full path in dir attribute, later I realized I should modify the environment variable path. Now it's working, I didn't append ./ before snapshooter. Thanks Xuesong -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 27,

RE: Multi-language Tokenizers / Filters recommended?

For chinese search, you may also consider org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.ChineseTokenizer. ChineseTokenizer Description: Extract tokens from the Stream using Character.getType() Rule: A Chinese character as a single token Copyright: Copyright (c) 2001 Company: The difference between thr

RE: add CJKTokenizer to solr

Thanks, Toru and Chris, I tried both the CJKTokenizer and CJKAnalyzer. Both return some unexpected highlight results when I tested with Germany. The field value I searched is Ein Mann beißt den Hund. The search criteria is beißt. When using CJKAnalyzer, beißt is treated as 2 single terms(bei

add CJKTokenizer to solr

Hi, I got the error below after adding CJKTokenizer to schema.xml. I checked the constructor of CJKTokenizer, it requires a Reader parameter, I guess that's why I get this error, I searched the email archive, it seems working for other users. Does anyone know what is the problem? Thanks

RE: question about highlight field

Hi, Chris, I rewrite the prefix wildcard query consult* to (consult consult?*), it works with highlighting. Do you think it's a possible solution? Could you explain a little bit why put a ? before * won't crash solr if matching a lot of terms? Thanks Xuesong In the trunk (soon to be Solr 1.2)

RE: question about sorting

-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: question about sorting On 6/11/07, Xuesong Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, first name, department, job title etc. Something like first name might be able to be a single field that is searchable and sortable (use a keyword tokenizer followed

question about sorting

Hi, My sorting fields include both TextField type and StrField type. Because TextField uses TokenizerFactory, they can't be sorted. I have to copy each TextField to a StrField and sort on those StrFields. Does anyone know if there is a better way to do that? Thanks Xuesong

RE: question about sorting

For example, first name, department, job title etc. Thanks Xuesong -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:35 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: question about sorting On 6/11/07, Xuesong

RE: highlight and wildcards ?

Frédéric, I asked a similar question several days before, it seems we don't have a perfect solution when using prefix wildcard with highlight. Here is what Chris said: in Solr 1.1, highlighting used the info from the raw query to do highlighting, hence in your query for consult* it would

RE: highlight and wildcards ?

will be the main activities of my users (they need to search latin texts, so that domin* is enough to match dominus or domino). So, I need some more investigations. Xuesong Luo a écrit : Frédéric, I asked a similar question several days before, it seems we don't have a perfect solution when using

TextField case sensitivity

I run a problem when searching on a TextField. When I pass q=William or q=WILLiam, solr is able to find records whose default search field value is William, however if I pass q=WilliAm, solr did not return any thing. I searched on the archive, Yonik mentioned the lowercasefilterfactory doesn't

RE: TextField case sensitivity

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:25 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: TextField case sensitivity On 6/7/07, Xuesong Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run a problem when searching on a TextField. When I pass q=William or q=WILLiam, solr

RE: TextField case sensitivity

want the same analyzer for indexing and query, just define one: analyzer tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ /analyzer Xuesong Luo wrote: I run a problem when searching on a TextField. When I pass q=William or q=WILLiam, solr

RE: question about highlight field

Yes, I'm using 1.1. The example in my last email is an expected result, not the real result. Indeed I didn't see the arr element in the highlighting element when either prefix wildcard or true wildcard query is used. I just tried nightly build, as you said, it works great except for prefix

RE: Wildcards / Binary searches

I have a similar question about dismax, here is what Chris said: the dismax handler uses a much more simplified query syntax then the standard request handler. Only +, -, and are special characters so wildcards are not supported. HTH -Original Message- From: galo [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: question about highlight field

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:43 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: question about highlight field On 1-Jun-07, at 9:37 AM, Xuesong Luo wrote: Hi, there, I have a question about how to use the highlight field(hl.fl), below is my test

RE: question about highlight field

Chris, Thanks for the reply. I'm curious why we want to search one field but highlight different fields? Doesn't it make more sense to only highlight the query fields? In my example, if I search f1, f2, f3, most likely I only want to the searching words in those fields to be highlighted. Of course

RE: question about highlight field

, Xuesong Luo wrote: So if I need to search a string in field f1, f2, f3 and highlight them in the response, I have to append hl.fl=f1,f2,f3 to my query. Is this the only solution? I thought of using searchall field, but the problem is the highlight element doesn't tell which value belongs

question about highlight field

Hi, there, I have a question about how to use the highlight field(hl.fl), below is my test result. As you can see, if I don't use hl.fl in the query, the highlighting element in the result only shows the id information. I have to add the field name (hl.fl=TITLE) to the query to see the field