Re: Solr 3.6.1: query performance is slow when asterisk is in the query

2012-08-31 Thread david3s
Chris, This is really good stuff, I said stuff not really thinking/knowing about the index inner-workings. I was thinking if I could use "copyField", as in my previous example: But I guess I would have had to write a custom processor and define a specific field type. I guess a more elegant

Re: Solr 3.6.1: query performance is slow when asterisk is in the query

2012-08-22 Thread david3s
Ok, I'll take your suggestion, but I would still be really happy if the wildcard searches behaved a little more intelligent (body:* not looking for everything in the body). More like when you do "q=*:*" it doesn't really search for everything in every field. Thanks -- View this message in conte

Re: Solr 3.6.1: query performance is slow when asterisk is in the query

2012-08-22 Thread david3s
Jack, sorry to forgot to answer you, we tried "[* TO *]" and the response times are the same as doing plain "*" -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-1-query-performance-is-slow-when-asterisk-is-in-the-query-tp4002496p4002708.html Sent from the Solr - User

Re: Solr 3.6.1: query performance is slow when asterisk is in the query

2012-08-22 Thread david3s
Hello Chris, thanks a lot for your reply. But is there an alternative solution? Because I see adding "has_body" as data duplication. Imagine in that in a Relational DB you had to create extra columns because you can't do something like "where body is not null" If there's no other alternative I'll

Re: StandardTokenizerFactory is behaving differently in Solr 3.6?

2012-08-02 Thread david3s
Hello Jack, We found that the problem is related to the *lucene* query parser in 3.6 select?q=author:David\ Duke&defType=lucene Would render the same results as: select?q=author:(David OR Duke)&defType=lucene But select?q=author:David\ Duke&defType=edismax Would render the same results as: selec