infrequently.
How to configure this in 1.4? Currently we optimize using optimize script
twice a day. Also, can there be a situation where the optimize can conflict
with commit operation? If yes, then how to avoid such kind of situation.
Many Thanks Regards
Dipti Khullar
Hi
Since last 2 days we are facing extremely slow behaviour with solr slave
servers. The threads are either in blocking or waiting state and require a
restart of servers to keep the production running.
Following are the relevant details:
There are 2 search servers in a virtualized VMware
Hi All
Is there any tool to analyze corrupted data in Solr. I am aware of luke.
But does it shows somehow that the data is corrupted?
Like some segments are missing or whether some documents have been corrupted
- not fully indexed?
Thanks
Dipti
Hey Janne
Can you please let me know what other optimizations are you talking about
here. Because in our application we are committing in about 5 mins but still
the response time is very low and at times there are some connection time
outs also.
Just wanted to confirm if you have done some major
queries are served from cache, response time
at first hit will always be high and perhaps when many such queries hit solr
slaves, they hang and thus the server at times throws read time outs?
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Dipti
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:22 PM, dipti khullar dipti.khul...@gmail.comwrote
queries have run does
SOLR switch over to the newly-opened searchers.
I suspect that what you're seeing is that the first few
queries after you update your index are paying this
penalty
HTH
Erick
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:30 AM, dipti khullar dipti.khul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
will be helpful !!
Thanks
Dipti
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:16 AM, dipti khullar dipti.khul...@gmail.com
wrote:
This assettype is variable. It can have around 6 values at a time.
But this is true that we apply
searcher warmup times.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch
- Original Message
From: dipti khullar dipti.khul...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thu, January 21, 2010 11:48:20 AM
Subject: Re: Improvising solr queries
Hi
Sorry
that an any
instance of time solr/home property can get corrupted?
One more thing we observed was that tomcat-users.xml was overwritten. Should
we debug towards that also?
Thanks
Dipti
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Jan 11, 2010, at 1:38 AM, dipti
Hi
We are running master/slave Solr 1.3 version on production since about 5
months.
Yesterday, we faced following issue on one of the slaves for the first time
because of which we had to restart the slave.
SEVERE: Could not start SOLR. Check solr/home property
java.lang.RuntimeException:
Hi
We have tried out various configurations settings to improvise the
performance of the site which is majorly using Solr but still the response
time remains about 4-5 reqs/sec. We also did some performance tests on Solr
1.4 but still there is a very minute improvement in performance. Currently
Hi
Can somebody let me know if its possible to configure RAMDirectory from
solrconfig.xml. Although its clearly mentioned in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-465 by Mark that he has worked
upon it, but still I couldn't find any such property in config file in Solr
1.4 latest download.
Examples can be found out at:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/Community/Hear-from-the-Experts/Articles/Faceted-Search-Solr
Simple configuration works with setting facet=truefacet.field=xyz
Thanks
Dipti
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
There is nothing
DirectSolrConnection in SolrJ
2. Also I found out some posts on memory leak issues with Solr 1.3, lucene
2.4.0 verison if DirectSolrConnectionis used.
Should this be avoided with lucene 2.4?
Can somebody guide me on these two queries.
Thanks
Dipti Khullar
14 matches
Mail list logo
