Re: Combining eDismax and SpellChecker

2014-04-05 Thread simpleliving...@gmail.com
Yes, I saw that earlier in one of your other postings. Is it the case that we cannot use the SpellChecker with a parser like edismax by making a configuration change without having to go thru this commercial product? Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "Ahmet Arslan" To: "solr-use

Re: eDismax parser and the mm parameter

2014-04-02 Thread simpleliving...@gmail.com
AM Hi SL, Instead of fuzzy queries, can't you use spell checker? Generally Spell Checker (a.k.a did you mean) is a preferred tool for typos. Ahmet On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 4:13 PM, "simpleliving...@gmail.com" wrote: It only works for a single word search term and not multi

Re: eDismax parser and the mm parameter

2014-04-02 Thread simpleliving...@gmail.com
It only works for a single word search term and not multiple word search term. Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "William Bell" To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Subject: eDismax parser and the mm parameter Date: Wed, Apr 2, 2014 12:03 AM Fuzzy is provided use ~ On Mon, Mar 31

Re: eDismax parser and the mm parameter

2014-03-30 Thread simpleliving...@gmail.com
Thanks Ahmet. So if its single term query like 'Ginseng' what does a mm=3 do to the query .I am guessing it would be reduced to 1 automatically in this case. Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "Ahmet Arslan" To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Subject: eDismax parser and the mm pa