Hi:
I think you are just trying to avoid complete re-index right?
why don't you take a look at this:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_0/updating-parts-of-documents.html
At 2021-02-17 21:14:11, "Mahmoud Almokadem" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I've an integer field on an index with bill
can you show the update request?
At 2021-01-07 20:25:13, "Flowerday, Matthew J"
wrote:
Hi There
I have recently upgraded a solr database from 7.7.1 to 8.7.0 and not wiped the
database and re-indexed (as this would take too long to run on site).
On my local windows mach
it's hard to answer your question without your solrconfig.xml,
managed-schema(or schema.xml), and good to have some log snippet as well~
At 2021-01-07 21:28:00, "ufuk yılmaz" wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I have been looking at our SolrCloud indexing performance statistics and
>trying t
I don't think you can achieve what you want---doing REAL rename.
why not just use collection alias? do you have any reason NOT to do that?
At 2021-01-08 04:20:00, "Mike Drob" wrote:
>I believe you may be able to use that command (or some combination of
>create alias commands) to c
Take a look at the document here:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_7/dynamic-fields.html#dynamic-fields
here's the point: "a field that does not match any explicitly defined fields
can be matched with a dynamic field."
so I guess the priority is quite clear~
At 2021-01-
did you configured PatternReplaceFilterFactory?
At 2021-01-08 12:16:06, "Rahul Goswami" wrote:
>Hello,
>So recently I was debugging a problem on Solr 7.7.2 where the query wasn't
>returning the desired results. Turned out that the indexed terms had
>underscore separated terms, but
why don't you check what is it trying to do number conversion? at least the
numberformatException is quite clear
At 2021-01-08 20:07:24, "Doss" wrote:
>We have 12 node SOLR cloud with 3 zookeeper ensemble
>RAM: 80 CPU:40 Heap:16GB Records: 4 Million
>
>We do real time update and
SOW default to false?
but this seems to be true right??
For Solr 7.5 I get
"parsedquery":"+(+(text1:ki7 (+text1:ki
+text1:7)))"
At 2020-12-28 01:13:29, "Tulsi Das" wrote:
>Hi ,
>Yes this look like related to sow (split on whitespace) param default
>behaviour change in solr 7.
>
>T
which query parser are you using? I think to answer your question, you need to
check the implementation of the query parser
At 2020-12-27 21:23:59, "nettadalet" wrote:
>Thank you, that was helpful!
>
>For Solr 4.6 I get
>"parsedquery": "PhraseQuery(TITLE_ItemCode_t:\"ki 7\")"
>
