Re: [Faceting] Exact Value Faceting VS ID Faceting

On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 15:56 +, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > I would like to have docValues because facets are going to be heavy on > those fields. > *Faceting approach * > *1) *Indexing the human readable field value Technically this will be a SORTED or SORTED_SET, which again means that a

Re: [Faceting] Exact Value Faceting VS ID Faceting

Thanks Toke for the answer, let me comment inline : On 26 November 2015 at 08:32, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 15:56 +, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > > I would like to have docValues because facets are going to be heavy on > > those fields. > > >

Re: [Faceting] Exact Value Faceting VS ID Faceting

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > If we had a hashing method String->long and guaranteed that there would > be no collisions (or we accepted the occasional faulty result), then we > could avoid the segment->global map as well as the centralized

[Faceting] Exact Value Faceting VS ID Faceting

Hi guys, let's open a discussion : *Use Case *: A set of fields I use only for : - exact search - faceting *Field Configuration* I don't need norms, I don't need term freq and I don't need positions. I do need the index for exact search. I would like to have docValues because facets are going