Anything currently in the trunk will most probably be in the BETA and
in the eventual release. So I'd go with the trunk code. It'll always
be closer to the actual release than ALPHA or BETA
I know there've been some changes recently around, exactly
the collection name. In fact there's a
: Erick Erickson
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 11:02 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.0.ALPHA vs 4.0 branch/trunk - what is best for upgrade?
Anything currently in the trunk will most probably be in the BETA and
in the eventual release. So I'd go with the trunk code. It'll always
The beta will have files that where in solr/conf and solr/data in
solr/collection1/conf|data instead.
What Solr test cases are you referring to? The only ones that should care about
this would have to be looking at the file system. If that is the case, simply
update the path. The built in
I am using AbstractSolrTestCase (which in turn uses
solr.util.TestHarness) as a basis for unittests, but the solr
installation is outside of my source tree and I don't want to
duplicate it just to change a few lines (and with the new solr4.0 I
hope I can get the test-framework in a jar file,
