I too am running into what appears to be the same thing.
Everything works and data is imported but I cannot see the new field in
the result.
If you can index stuff into a new schema for test, try defining one
with dynamicField name=* stored=true indexed=true type=string. Your
schema may have one like this commented out and/or set to false.
This would show you exactly what you are indexing and solve whether
you have any spelling or
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I'm at my wits end. I tried your field definitions (using the
exampledocs XML) and they work just fine. As far as if you mess up the date
on the way in, you should be seeing stack traces in your log files.
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
If any value is in a bogus format, the entire document batch in that HTTP
request fails. That is the right timestamp format.
The index may be corrupted somehow. Can you try removing all of the fields in
data/ and trying
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
What happens if you sort ascending rather than descending? Depending on
what (if anything) you've done with sortMissingFirst/Last on that field,
it's possible that you're just seeing the results of the sort and docs
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you uploaded data with that field populated? Solr is not like a
relational database. It does not automatically populate a new field when you
add it to the schema. If you sort on a field, a document with no data in
Well, I'm at my wits end. I tried your field definitions (using the
exampledocs XML) and they work just fine. As far as if you mess up the date
on the way in, you should be seeing stack traces in your log files.
The only way I see not getting the Sorry, no Term Info available :(
message is if you
If any value is in a bogus format, the entire document batch in that HTTP
request fails. That is the right timestamp format.
The index may be corrupted somehow. Can you try removing all of the fields in
data/ and trying again?
- Original Message -
| From: Erick Erickson
I'd try several things
1 just because you an sort has nothing to do with whether the field is
returned. Sorting uses the indexed data, returning it is the stored data.
So it's a bit of a red herring when you can sort on a field but not see it,
although it is a good test that your schema knows
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd try several things
1 just because you an sort has nothing to do with whether the field is
returned. Sorting uses the indexed data, returning it is the stored data.
So it's a bit of a red herring when you can
What happens if you sort ascending rather than descending? Depending on
what (if anything) you've done with sortMissingFirst/Last on that field,
it's possible that you're just seeing the results of the sort and docs with
your new field are somewhere down the list. If you've done nothing, you
Have you uploaded data with that field populated? Solr is not like a relational
database. It does not automatically populate a new field when you add it to the
schema. If you sort on a field, a document with no data in that field comes
first or last (I don't know which).
- Original
Hi,
That should work just fine. It;s either a bug or you are doing something
you didn't mention. Maybe you can provide a small, self-enclosed unit test
and stick it in JIRA?
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring -
And - just to get stupid options out of the way - you don't have any
parameters defined on the handlers that may list the fields to return?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
That should work just fine. It;s either a bug or you are doing something
you didn't mention. Maybe you can provide a small, self-enclosed unit test
and stick it in JIRA?
I would assume that it's me
15 matches
Mail list logo
