Thanks for this -- we're also trying out bobo-browse for Lucene, and
early results look pretty enticing. They greatly sped up how fast you
read in documents from disk, among other things:
http://bobo-browse.wiki.sourceforge.net/
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Shalin Shekhar
SOLR 1.4 has a new feature
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-475that speeds up faceting
on fields with many terms by adding
an UnInvertedField.
Bobo uses a custom field cache as well. It may be useful to benchmark the 3
different approaches (bitsets, SOLR-475, Bobo). This could be a good
Hi Brad:
We have since (Bobo) added some perf tests which allows you to do some
benchmarking very quickly:
http://code.google.com/p/bobo-browse/wiki/BoboPerformance
Let me know if you need help setting up.
-John
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jason Rutherglen
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Bradford Stephens
bradfordsteph...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the facet aggregation take place on the Solr search server, or
the Solr client?
It's pretty slow for me -- on a machine with 8 cores/ 8 GB RAM, 50
million document index (about 36M unique values in
Does the facet aggregation take place on the Solr search server, or
the Solr client?
It's pretty slow for me -- on a machine with 8 cores/ 8 GB RAM, 50
million document index (about 36M unique values in the author
field), a query that returns 131,000 hits takes about 20 seconds to
calculate the
Does the facet aggregation take place on the Solr search server, or the
Solr client?
Solr server.
Faceting is an expensive operation by nature, especially when the hits are
large in number. Solr caches these values once computed. You might want to
tweak cache related parameters in your solr
Greetings,
We've been experimenting with grouping fields returned from document
search results in Lucene, and we haven't gotten anything very
encouraging. Basically, the more results we return, the longer it
takes -- tens of seconds. Probably because we're doing expensive disks
seeks. I'm hoping
you can refer to the facet search of solr, that might help you.
2009/7/10 Bradford Stephens bradfordsteph...@gmail.com
Greetings,
We've been experimenting with grouping fields returned from document
search results in Lucene, and we haven't gotten anything very
encouraging. Basically, the
It looks like field collapsing may be the key:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
But it also doesn't seem to be 'finalized' yet. I wonder how
performant it is with indexes of 50 million documents+?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:42 PM, shbsuh...@gmail.com wrote:
you can refer to the facet
Oh, wow... I think that faceted search is the right path, especially
since seeing this amazing site:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/Community/Hear-from-the-Experts/Articles/Faceted-Search-Solr
I hope it's performant over hundreds of thousands of search results :)
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:13
10 matches
Mail list logo
