Re: Best performance for facet dates in trunk using solr.TrieDateField

2010-03-14 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Peter Sturge wrote: > I'm a bit confused now. In your recent Mastering Solr webinar (great stuff, > btw, thank you!), the slides imply using tdate fields with a precisionStep > of 8 for faster range queries: > >   - Use tint, tfloat, tlong, tdouble, tdate for faste

Re: Best performance for facet dates in trunk using solr.TrieDateField

2010-03-14 Thread Peter Sturge
Hi Yonik, I'm a bit confused now. In your recent Mastering Solr webinar (great stuff, btw, thank you!), the slides imply using tdate fields with a precisionStep of 8 for faster range queries: - Use tint, tfloat, tlong, tdouble, tdate for faster range queries - - Date faceting also

Re: Best performance for facet dates in trunk using solr.TrieDateField

2010-03-13 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Marc Sturlese wrote: > I am testing date facets in trunk with huge index. Aparently, as the default > solrconfig.xml shows, the fastest way to run dace facets queries is index > the field with this data type: > >     >     precisionStep="6" positionIncrementGap="0"/

Best performance for facet dates in trunk using solr.TrieDateField

2010-03-03 Thread Marc Sturlese
erformance-for-facet-dates-in-trunk-using-solr.TrieDateField-tp27767793p27767793.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.