Re: Boosting documents by categorical preferences

2014-01-30 Thread Amit Nithian
Chris, Sounds good! Thanks for the tips.. I'll be glad to submit my talk to this as I have a writeup pretty much ready to go. Cheers Amit On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : The initial results seem to be kinda promising... of course there are > many > : more optimiz

Re: Boosting documents by categorical preferences

2014-01-28 Thread Chris Hostetter
: The initial results seem to be kinda promising... of course there are many : more optimizations I could do like decay user ratings over time to indicate : that preferences decay over time so a 5 rating a year ago doesn't count as : much as a 5 rating today. : : Hope this helps others. I'll open

Re: Boosting documents by categorical preferences

2014-01-27 Thread Amit Nithian
Hi Chris (and others interested in this), Sorry for dropping off.. I got sidetracked with other work and came back to this and finally got a V1 of this implemented. The final process is as follows: 1) Pre-compute the global categorical num_ratings/average/std-dev (so for Action the average rating

Re: Boosting documents by categorical preferences

2013-11-22 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I thought about that but my concern/question was how. If I used the pow : function then I'm still boosting the bad categories by a small : amount..alternatively I could multiply by a negative number but does that : work as expected? I'm not sure i understand your concern: negative powers would

Re: Boosting documents by categorical preferences

2013-11-20 Thread Amit Nithian
I thought about that but my concern/question was how. If I used the pow function then I'm still boosting the bad categories by a small amount..alternatively I could multiply by a negative number but does that work as expected? I haven't done much with negative boosting except for the sledgehammer

Re: Boosting documents by categorical preferences

2013-11-19 Thread Chris Hostetter
: My approach was something like: : 1) Look at the categories that the user has preferred and compute the : z-score : 2) Pick the top 3 among those : 3) Use those to boost search results. I think that totaly makes sense ... the additional bit i was suggesting that you consider is that instead of

Re: Boosting documents by categorical preferences

2013-11-18 Thread Amit Nithian
Hey Chris, Sorry for the delay and thanks for your response. This was inspired by your talk on boosting and biasing that you presented way back when at a meetup. I'm glad that my general approach seems to make sense. My approach was something like: 1) Look at the categories that the user has pref

Re: Boosting documents by categorical preferences

2013-11-14 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I have a question around boosting. I wanted to use the &boost= to write a : nested query that will boost a document based on categorical preferences. You have no idea how stoked I am to see you working on this in a real world application. : Currently I have the weights set to the z-score equi

Boosting documents by categorical preferences

2013-11-12 Thread Amit Nithian
Hi all, I have a question around boosting. I wanted to use the &boost= to write a nested query that will boost a document based on categorical preferences. For a movie search for example, say that a user likes drama, comedy, and action. I could use things like qq=&q={!boost%20b=$b%20defType=edis