But in my case i see output as below
0
0
*:*
on
xml
1533734431931
IT
1
1
1608130338704326656
Data
1
2
1608130338704326656
omkar
1
1608130338704326656
ITI
2
3
1608130338712715264
Entry
2
This is how nested docs look like. These are document blocks with parent in
the end. Block Join Queries work on these blocks.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:47 PM omp...@rediffmail.com <
omkar.pra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Mikhail. But as per documentation below nested document
> ingestion i
Thanks a lot Mikhail. But as per documentation below nested document
ingestion is possible. Is this limitation of DIH?
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/uploading-data-with-index-handlers.html#UploadingDatawithIndexHandlers-NestedChildDocuments
Also can block join query be used to get exp
It never works like you expect. You need to search for parents and then
hook up [child]. I see some improvements are coming, but now that is.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 9:11 PM omp...@rediffmail.com
wrote:
> Thanks Mikhail verbose did help. _root_ field was missing in schema also in
> make some chan
Thanks Mikhail verbose did help. _root_ field was missing in schema also in
make some changes in child entity. Like i created id as alias to emp_id ( in
child query) which is id column of parent table.
DIH has debug&verbose modes. Have you tried to use them?
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:11 PM omp...@rediffmail.com
wrote:
> Thanks Mikhail, i tried changing conf but that did not help
>
>
> driver="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"
> url="jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/test"
>
Thanks Mikhail, i tried changing conf but that did not help
Hi, Omkar.
Could it happen that child docs as well as parents are assigned same "id"
field values implicitly and removed due to uniqueKey collision?
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 10:12 PM omkar.pra...@gmail.com <
omkar.pra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am using similar db-data config as below for indexing t
I am using similar db-data config as below for indexing this parent-child
data. solr version 6.6.2
SELECT id as emp_id, name FROM emp;
+++
| emp_id | name |
+++
| 1 | omkar |
| 2 | ashwin |
+++
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
select * fro