Thanks that's what I suspected given what I'm seeing but wanted to make
sure. Again thanks
On Nov 5, 2015 1:08 PM, "Mikhail Khludnev"
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>
> > Is this expected to work?
>
>
> I think it is. I'm still not sure I understand the question
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Is this expected to work?
I think it is. I'm still not sure I understand the question. But let me
bring some details from SOLR-3076:
- Solr's backs on Lucene's "deleteTerm" which is supplied into
indexWriter.updateDocument();
- when pare
The field is "key" and this is the value of unique key in schema.xml
On Oct 17, 2015 3:23 AM, "Mikhail Khludnev"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What are the field names for parent and child docs exactly?
> Whats' in schema.xml?
> What you've got if you actually try to do this?
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1
Hello,
What are the field names for parent and child docs exactly?
Whats' in schema.xml?
What you've got if you actually try to do this?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I am looking at using child documents and noticed that if I specify a child
> and parent with the sa
I am looking at using child documents and noticed that if I specify a child
and parent with the same key solr indexes this fine and I can retrieve both
documents separately. Is this expected to work?
-Jamie
