Yes they are both 6.0.
On Apr 25, 2016 1:07 PM, "Anshum Gupta" wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Can you confirm if the version of Solr and SolrJ are in sync ?
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Joe Lawson <
> jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
>
> > This appear to be a bug
Hi Joe,
Can you confirm if the version of Solr and SolrJ are in sync ?
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Joe Lawson <
jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> This appear to be a bug that'll be fixed in 6.1:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7729
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:07
This appear to be a bug that'll be fixed in 6.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7729
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Joe this might be _version_ as in Solr's optimistic concurrency used in
> atomic updates, etc
>
>
Joe this might be _version_ as in Solr's optimistic concurrency used in
atomic updates, etc
http://yonik.com/solr/optimistic-concurrency/
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:24 PM Joe Lawson <
jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> I'm updating from a basic Solr Client to the
I'm updating from a basic Solr Client to the ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient and
I'm hitting a really strange error. I cannot share the code but the snippet
is like:
try (ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient solrUpdateClient =
> new ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient("
>