a matter of
syntax...)
Indeed, the friend list will obviously be cached.
Thanks.
Br,
Benjamin.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3874961.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
The hypothesis is : 300K users, an average of 100 friends each and 200
documents (each).
Br,
Benjamin.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3874982.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
where this is documented.
paul
Indeed, the friend list will obviously be cached.
Thanks.
Br,
Benjamin.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3874961.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3873462.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
way would be to index users and users friends and somehow letting
solr doing all the job.
What do you think ? Is the second solution even possible ?
Thanks !
Br,
Benjamin.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3873462
, they propose auto-complete for current user
friends, so maybe it makes sense...)
Br,
Benjamin.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3874112.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Content-privacy-search-index-tp3873462p3873462.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Is it the best way to do that ?
- It's obvious that i need to index the registered users in
Solr (because an
user can search for others), but is it clever to index friend
list for each
user as well ? (if we take a look at the search box on
Facebook, or other
any sexy social network,
