On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 3:01 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> the default query parser
>>> doesn't support range queries with mixed upper/lower bound inclusion.
>>
>> This has just been
On 10/22/2010 3:01 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
the default query parser
doesn't support range queries with mixed upper/lower bound inclusion.
This has just been added to trunk.
Things like [0 TO 100} now work.
Awesome! Is it easily port
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> the default query parser
> doesn't support range queries with mixed upper/lower bound inclusion.
This has just been added to trunk.
Things like [0 TO 100} now work.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
: Reindexing with a +1MILLI hack had occurred to me and I guess that's what
: I'll do in the meantime; it just seemed like something that people must have
: run into before! I suppose it depends on the granularity of your
people have definitely run into it before, and most of them (that i know
Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Thu, 9/9/10, Liam O'Boyle wrote:
> From: Liam O'Boyle
> Subject: Re: Date faceting +1MONTH problem
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, September 9, 2010, 4:20 PM
> Hi Chris,
>
> Yes
Just attended a talk at JavaZone (www.javazone.no) by Stephen Colebourne about
JSR-310 which will make these kind of operations easier in future JDK, and how
Joda-Time goes a great way of enabling it today. I'm not saying it would fix
your GAP issue, as it's all about what definition of "month"
Hi Chris,
Yes, I saw the facet.range.include feature and briefly tried to implement it
before realising that it was Solr 3.1 only :) I agree that it seems like
the best solution to problem.
Reindexing with a +1MILLI hack had occurred to me and I guess that's what
I'll do in the meantime; it just
: I'm trying to break down the data over a year into facets by month; to avoid
: overlap, I'm using -1MILLI on the start and end dates and using a gap of
: +1MONTH.
:
: However, it seems like February completely breaks my monthly cycles, leading
Yep.
Everything you posted makes sense to me in ho
Evening,
I'm trying to break down the data over a year into facets by month; to avoid
overlap, I'm using -1MILLI on the start and end dates and using a gap of
+1MONTH.
However, it seems like February completely breaks my monthly cycles, leading
to incorrect counts further down the line; facets th
