would be prudent to ignore them. At any rate, lawyers will be
involved
>>> and they aren't cheap. Until the suits have been played out with the
likes
>>> of eBay, Microsoft, and Adobe, potentially anyone who uses faceted
search
>>> systems could potentially be at
potentially anyone who uses faceted search
systems could potentially be at risk.
Take it for what it's worth. Don't shoot the messenger.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Faceted-Search-Patent-Lawsuit-Please-Read-tp3259475p3261514.html
Sent from th
e been known to act on these threats. I don't think
>> it would be prudent to ignore them. At any rate, lawyers will be involved
>> and they aren't cheap. Until the suits have been played out with the likes
>> of eBay, Microsoft, and Adobe, potentially anyone who uses f
played out with the likes
> of eBay, Microsoft, and Adobe, potentially anyone who uses faceted search
> systems could potentially be at risk.
>
> Take it for what it's worth. Don't shoot the messenger.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucen
yers will be involved
and they aren't cheap. Until the suits have been played out with the likes
of eBay, Microsoft, and Adobe, potentially anyone who uses faceted search
systems could potentially be at risk.
Take it for what it's worth. Don't shoot the messenger.
--
View this
Le 17 août 2011 à 13:01, Robert Muir a écrit :
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:58:29PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>> I know you mean well and are probably wondering what to do next [...]
>>
>> Still, a short heads-up like Johnson's would seem OK?
>> After all, this is of concern to us all.
>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Tomas Zerolo
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:58:29PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> I know you mean well and are probably wondering what to do next [...]
>
> Still, a short heads-up like Johnson's would seem OK?
>
> After all, this is of concern to us all.
>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:58:29PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I know you mean well and are probably wondering what to do next [...]
Still, a short heads-up like Johnson's would seem OK?
After all, this is of concern to us all.
Regards
-- tomás
hing that can only be decided in the
>> courts.
>>
>> -Grant
>>
>
> We will definitely be in touch with our legal counsel. This was more a
> "heads up" in hopes that others aren't blindsided by this.
>
>
> --
> View this message
te in public on something that can only be decided in the
> courts.
>
> -Grant
>
We will definitely be in touch with our legal counsel. This was more a
"heads up" in hopes that others aren't blindsided by this.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.47206
this. I'd appreciate any insight
> others might have regarding the issue.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Faceted-Search-Patent-Lawsuit-Please-Read-tp3259475p3259475.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
7;m interested to know how all of this will play out in
the courts. Faceted search seems to be a component of every e-commerce site
on the web.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Faceted-Search-Patent-Lawsuit-Please-Read-tp3259475p3259672.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:03 AM, LaMaze Johnson wrote:
[...]
> Just thought I would make others aware of this. I'd appreciate any insight
> others might have regarding the issue.
[...]
If you will permit me a moment of levity, from the perspective of
someone in India, I would say, move to a non
nabble.com/Faceted-Search-Patent-Lawsuit-Please-Read-tp3259475p3259475.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
14 matches
Mail list logo
