What I'm after is to restrict the 'whole' index through a set of unique
keys.
Each unique key set is likely to have between 100 & 1 keys and these
sets are expected to be different for most of the queries. I'm trying to see
if I can achieve a generic 'fk' (for filter key) kind of parameter so
On 6/19/07, Henrib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it reasonable to implement a RequestHandler that systematically uses a
DocSet as a filter for the restriction queries?
How many unique keys would typically be used to construct the filter?
I'm under the impression
that SolrIndexSearcher.getDocS
Is it reasonable to implement a RequestHandler that systematically uses a
DocSet as a filter for the restriction queries? I'm under the impression
that SolrIndexSearcher.getDocSet(Query, DocSet) would use the cache properly
& that calling it in a loop would perform the 'and' between the filters..
On 6/18/07, Henrib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Yonik;
Let me twist the same question another way; I'm running Solr embedded, the
uniqueKey set that pre-exists may be large, is per-query (most likely not
useful to cache it) and is iterable. I'd rather avoid making a string to
build the 'fq'
Thanks Yonik;
Let me twist the same question another way; I'm running Solr embedded, the
uniqueKey set that pre-exists may be large, is per-query (most likely not
useful to cache it) and is iterable. I'd rather avoid making a string to
build the 'fq', get it parsed, etc.
Would it be as safe & mor
On 6/17/07, Henrib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Merely an efficiency related question: is there any other way to filter on a
uniqueKey set than using the 'fq' parameter & building a list of the
uniqueKeys?
I don't thnik so...
In 'raw' Lucene, you could use filters directly in search; is this (c
Merely an efficiency related question: is there any other way to filter on a
uniqueKey set than using the 'fq' parameter & building a list of the
uniqueKeys?
In 'raw' Lucene, you could use filters directly in search; is this (close
to) equivalent efficiency wise?
Thanks
--
View this message in c
