On 1/26/07, Walter Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> +(+text:jame +text:sutherland) +searchSet:testSet
>> +(+text:james~0.75 +text:sutherland~0.75) +searchSet:testSet
>
> I can tell from the first that this is a stemmed field... "james" is
> transformed to "jame"
"James" bein
Yonik Seeley wrote:
+(+text:jame +text:sutherland) +searchSet:testSet
+(+text:james~0.75 +text:sutherland~0.75) +searchSet:testSet
I can tell from the first that this is a stemmed field... "james" is
transformed to "jame"
"James" being the plural of "Jame" according to the stemmer. I guess my
On 1/25/07, Walter Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I ran the debug against the two following queries:
q=(James Sutherland) returns 13
q=(James~0.75 Sutherland~0.75) returns 1
OK, I have an idea of what's going on... here are your two parsed
queries side by side:
+(+text:jame +text:sut
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 1/23/07, Walter Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is quite possibly a Lucene question rather than a solr one, so my
apologies if you think its out of scope.
Underlying the solr search, are some very useful Lucene constructs.
One of the most powerful, imho, is the til
On 1/23/07, Walter Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is quite possibly a Lucene question rather than a solr one, so my
apologies if you think its out of scope.
Underlying the solr search, are some very useful Lucene constructs.
One of the most powerful, imho, is the tilde number combination
This is quite possibly a Lucene question rather than a solr one, so my
apologies if you think its out of scope.
Underlying the solr search, are some very useful Lucene constructs.
One of the most powerful, imho, is the tilde number combination for a
"fuzzy" search.
In one of my data sets
