Yeah, there are a lot of moving parts to connect
Let's see the highlight configuration you're
using. Should be in your solrconfig.xml file for the request
handler you're using. Are you calling out the field you want
highlighted in the hl.fl list?
Unfortunately getting specific fields
Hi,
I'm having trouble negotiating the steep Solr learning curve...
1. I'm trying to store scanned and OCRed newspapers in PDF format into Solr
for full-text searching.
I've tried most (all?) of the examples and sample configurations that come
with Solr 5.3.0 and I can upload the PDFs.
Searching
-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with highlighting
You need to share with us the Solr request you made, any any custom
request handler settings that might map to. Chances are you just need
to twiddle with the highlighter parameters (see wiki for docs) to get
it to do what you want
...@frameweld.com wrote:
Hi, I need help with highlighting fields that would match a query.
So far, my results only highlight if the field is from all_text, and
I would like it to use other fields. It simply isn't the case if I
just turn highlighting on. Any ideas why it only applies to
all_text
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with highlighting
It looks to me like a tokenisation issue, all_text content and the query
text will match, but the string fieldtype fields 'might not' and therefore
will not be highlighted.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:40 PM, n...@frameweld.com wrote:
Here's my
Hi, I need help with highlighting fields that would match a query. So far, my
results only highlight if the field is from all_text, and I would like it to
use other fields. It simply isn't the case if I just turn highlighting on. Any
ideas why it only applies to all_text? Here is my schema
...@frameweld.com wrote:
Hi, I need help with highlighting fields that would match a query.
So far, my results only highlight if the field is from all_text, and
I would like it to use other fields. It simply isn't the case if I
just turn highlighting on. Any ideas why it only applies to
all_text? Here
That's the expected result and I'm pretty happy with it.
But with this field :
field name=variableEltDDIXML
required=true
type=string
multiValued=false
indexed=true
stored=true
compressed=false
