for
company_text which is just the full field.
Is it possible to only return the highlights for the fields that had a match
?
I tried requireFieldMatch with usePhraseHighlighter but that doesn't work.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-highlig
Hi Markus,
thanks for the tip. I replaced the string field with a tokenizer field and
now it works. Thank you!
Kind regards,
Nick
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089p2922785.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
Oh!
I did't see the "string"
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089p2922532.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ults, both of the text fields contain the query "solr".
> In the highlight tag I get only the IDs:
>
>
>
> Any ideas what may be causing this and how I can debug it? Thanks.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Nick
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089
> p2918089.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ve no idea what is wrong?
Kind regards,
Nick
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089p2922482.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Have you recently change its type from unstored to stored?
if so you have to reindex .
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089p2922117.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
Hi Grijesh,
The field text is stored and yet it is not working.
Kind regards,
Nick
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089p2918518.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Whether your field text is stored or not? Highlighting works with stored
fields of schema only.
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089p2918299.html
Sent from the Solr - User
I get back two results, both of the text fields contain the query "solr". In
the highlight tag I get only the IDs:
Any ideas what may be causing this and how I can debug it? Thanks.
Kind regards,
Nick
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlig
Stefan,
this is a duplicate post for
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-Problem-td2746022.html
no? if see, please stick w/ one of them
Regards
Stefan
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Stefan Mueller wrote:
> dear solr users,
>
> my data looks like this:
>
> j]s(dh
dear solr users,
my data looks like this:
j]s(dh)fjk [hf]sjkadh asdj(kfh) [skdjfh aslkfjhalwe uigfrhj bsd bsdfga sjfg
asdlfj.
if I want to query for the first "word", the following queries must match:
j]s(dh)fjk
j]s(dh)fjk
j]sdhfjk
jsdhfjk
dhf
So the matching should ignore some characters lik
lundi 28 mars 2011 11:16
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Highlighting Problem
dear solr specialists,
my data looks like this:
j]s(dh)fjk [hf]sjkadh asdj(kfh) [skdjfh aslkfjhalwe uigfrhj bsd bsdfga sjfg
asdlfj.
if I want to query for the first "word", the following queries must
dear solr specialists,
my data looks like this:
j]s(dh)fjk [hf]sjkadh asdj(kfh) [skdjfh aslkfjhalwe uigfrhj bsd bsdfga sjfg
asdlfj.
if I want to query for the first "word", the following queries must match:
j]s(dh)fjk
j]s(dhfjk
j]sdhfjk
jsdhfjk
dhf
So the matching should ignore some character
Hello.
I enabled highlighting and it works perfect, but not for all queries.
For example if ?q=canon+powershot I get this response:
---
{
"responseHeader":{
"status":0,
"QTime":4},
"response":{"numFound":296,"start":0,"maxScore":4.3135004
On 8/11/06, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the report. This is a known Lucene Highlighter issue; see
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-645.
The issue contains a patch which you may want to apply to your local
code, though there are some cases which could cause relat
On 8/11/06, Andrew May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm afraid I've found another slightly odd thing with Highlighting, in this
case in a
multi-valued field I'm using for author names.
Thanks for the report. This is a known Lucene Highlighter issue; see
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Hi,
I'm afraid I've found another slightly odd thing with Highlighting, in this case in a
multi-valued field I'm using for author names.
The author names are typically Surname, initials (e.g. May, A.D.), and these are the kind
of results I'm getting:
authors:Buxton
02
Duncan, W.I.Bu
17 matches
Mail list logo