urning 250 records is nearly 30sec.
>
> 2)Even of I am giving the same query just by changing the &start parameter
> to higher values performance keeps on degrading.
>
> inputs on this are appreciated.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://luc
a single customer we have multiple users and each user may
> apply different search criteria before sorting on the field so if we can
> cache the sorted results then it may improve the user experience with
> performance.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.47
user experience with
performance.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-can-I-optimize-Sorting-on-multiple-text-fields-tp3990874p3991129.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ing solr 3.6.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-can-I-optimize-Sorting-on-multiple-text-fields-tp3990874.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
that each
> time I get the docs from filter cache
>
> Please can anybody tell me whether this is the good approach or there is
> some better way of doing this?
> I am using solr 3.6.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://luce
context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-can-I-optimize-Sorting-on-multiple-text-fields-tp3990874.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
