Hi,
how can I index time boost nested documents JSON format?
Hi
Why don't you do this at the searching time?ex:
q=fullName:foo+lastUpdatedBy:barqf=fullName^2+lastUpdatedBy^0.5
2012/8/17 bbarani bbar...@gmail.com
Hi,
I am trying to implement index time boost via DIH. but I want to boost at
field level rather than document level. Ex:
Consider
Hi,
I am trying to implement index time boost via DIH. but I want to boost at
field level rather than document level. Ex:
Consider there are 2 fields in a document: LastUpdatedBy, fullName. After
indexing both the fields, I am copying the data from both the field in to a
default search field
:
: I have a requirement where I need to display records with more recent values
: for approval_dt to come first when a query is made. I thought of approaching
: this in 2 different ways:-
...
: 2. INDEX-TIME boosting.
: I sorted the query from databse itself in asc order of approval_dt
a substitute for sorting. It
will
be faster (I'm pretty sure) but isn't the same thing. The index time
boost
is going to influence the score but not totally become the score... which
means that in all likelihood there will be documents in search results
that
are out of order with respect
for the specific
field you apply the boost too -- if you don't search on that field (with a
score based query type), the boost doesn't affect things. so if you
applied an index time boost to some field named approval_dt then that
boost isn't going to matter unless you query against the approval_dt
a substitute for sorting. It will
be faster (I'm pretty sure) but isn't the same thing. The index time boost
is going to influence the score but not totally become the score... which
means that in all likelihood there will be documents in search results that
are out of order with respect
Hi,
I have a requirement to get results in the order of latest date of a field
called approval_dt. ie results having the latest approval date should appear
first in the SOLR results xml. A sorting desc on approval_dt gave me this.
Can index-time boost be of use here to improve performance. Could
No, the reverse is true. Sorting is very very fast in Lucene. The
first sort operation spends a lot of time making a data structure and
then following sort calls use it.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Anil Cherian
cherian.anil2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I just now tried a sorting on the
Hi,
I am working on index-time boosting.
I have a field named approval_dt. I have created that field in my SOLR xml
to be uploaded, by sorting my query in ascending order of approval_dt and
then increasing the boost for this field by 0.1 as i encounter new records
from database. In my schema.xml
proper sorted results. Could anyone suggest whether I am doing
something wrong.
thanks and rgds,
Anil.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Anil Cherian cherian.anil2...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Subject: index-time boost ... query
To: solr-user
Anil, without delving into why your boosting isn't working as you expect, why
don't you simply sort? Based on a message you sent to me directly (excerpted
bellow), it seems you want sorting, not boosting. You could subsequently sort
by score after approval_dt.
~ David Smiley
Author:
Hi David,
Thank you for the mail.
It seems you are right.sorting might solve the issue as it is not giving
any special weightage to any record other than its approval_dt is the latest
one.. I think i am convinced for now.
I am eagerly waiting for your book around thanks giving so taht i can
Hi David,
I just now tried a sorting on the results and I got the records with latest
approval_dt first.
My question now is will index-time boosting method increase the response. ie
will I be able to acheive the same thing i achieved
using sorting much faster if i use index-time boosting.
If
Hi,
Sending this mail again after I joined the sol-user group..Kindly find time
to help.
Thanks and Rgds,
Anil
-- Forwarded message --
From: Anil Cherian cherian.anil2...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Subject: solr index-time boost... help required please
To: solr
Hi all,
If I have two fields that are copied into a copyField, and I index
data in these fields using different index-time boosts, are those
boosts propagated into the copyField?
Thanks!
Mat
Mat Brown wrote:
Hi all,
If I have two fields that are copied into a copyField, and I index
data in these fields using different index-time boosts, are those
boosts propagated into the copyField?
Thanks!
Mat
No, but the norms of source fields of copyField are propagated
into the
Hi all,
Can we specify the index-time boost value for a particular field in
schema.xml?
Thanks,
Siddharth
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Gargate, Siddharth sgarg...@ptc.comwrote:
Hi all,
Can we specify the index-time boost value for a particular field in
schema.xml?
No. You can specify it along with the document when you add it to Solr.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
:
: Otis, here is the setting in the schema for the fields I use. OmitNorms
: is not set to any value here. Should explicitly set the value to false.
bear in mind, fields inherit the omitNorms value from their fieldtype if
they don't specify explicitly, so check that too.
: need to be stored in
I am using solr in my rails application. When I create the document that
need to be stored in Solr I can see the boost values being set on the
fields as attributes. However when I browse the indexes through luke I
see a boost value of 1. What am I missing. Thanks for your input.
-Madhan
Is your field defined with omitNorms=true by any chance?
Otis
--
Lucene Consulting -- http://lucene-consulting.com/
- Original Message
From: Madhan Subhas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:35:17 AM
Subject: Index time boost
@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:35:17 AM
Subject: Index time boost is not working
I am using solr in my rails application. When I create the document that
need to be stored in Solr I can see the boost values being set on the
fields as attributes. However when I browse the indexes through
Check your schema.xml, that's where you'll see how the field is defined.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Thierry Collogne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:27:54 AM
Subject: Re: Index time boost is not working
How do you browse the indexes
-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Index time boost is not working
Check your schema.xml, that's where you'll see how the field is defined.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Thierry
25 matches
Mail list logo
