gt;
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Ofer Fort
>> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
>> Sent: Fri, April 22, 2011 1:00:05 P
2011 1:00:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Index upgrade from 1.4.1 to 3.1 and 4.0
>
> Thanks Otis, but this is not my case. Most of my fields are not stored
> , but I do have the original data in case I need to reindex.
> My question is do I need to?
> If my 1.4.1 can be read by 3.1, I ass
> Otis
>
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Ofer Fort
>> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
>> Sent: Fri, April
. :)
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Ofer Fort
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Sent: Fri, April 22, 2011 10:34:26 AM
> Subject: Re: Index upg
Nobody?
Am I the only one in need of upgrading an index that was created with 1.4.1?
Thanks for any info
Ofer
On Friday, April 22, 2011, Ofer Fort wrote:
> Hi all,
> While doing some tests, I realized that an index that was created with
> solr 1.4.1 is readable by solr 3.1, but nt readable by so
Hi all,
While doing some tests, I realized that an index that was created with
solr 1.4.1 is readable by solr 3.1, but nt readable by solr 4.0.
If I plan to migrate my index to 4.0, and I prefer not to reindex it
all, what would be my best course of action?
Will it be possible to continue to write
