This should also be true of the various ways you might force quit in
Windows, right?
2009/8/7 Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
Kill -9 will not corrupt your index, but you would lose any
uncommitted documents.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
I've seen several threads that are one or two years old saying that
performing kill -9 on the java process running Solr either CAN, or CAN NOT
corrupt your index. The more recent ones seem to say that it CAN NOT, but
before I bake a kill -9 into my control script (which first tries a normal
kill,
Kill -9 will not corrupt your index, but you would lose any
uncommitted documents.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Michael _solrco...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen several threads that are one or two years old saying that
performing kill -9 on the java
Yonik,
Uncommitted (as in solr uncommited) on unflushed?
Thanks,
Otis
- Original Message
From: Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 11:10:49 AM
Subject: Re: Is kill -9 safe or not?
Kill -9 will not corrupt your
pointing to that new segment.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Thanks,
Otis
- Original Message
From: Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 11:10:49 AM
Subject: Re: Is kill -9 safe or not?
Kill -9
,
they aren't part of the index until the index descriptor (segments_n)
is written pointing to that new segment.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is-kill--9-safe-or-not--tp24866506p24869260.html
Sent from the Solr - User