Re: Is there any JIRA changed the stored order of multivalued field?

2016-04-19 Thread forest_soup
Thanks! That's very helpful! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-there-any-JIRA-changed-the-stored-order-of-multivalued-field-tp4264325p4271312.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Is there any JIRA changed the stored order of multivalued field?

2016-03-28 Thread Chris Hostetter
: We do POST to add data to Solr v4.7 and Solr v5.3.2 respectively. The : attachmentnames are in 789, 456, 123 sequence: ... : And we do GET to select data from solr v4.7 and solr v5.3.2 respectively: : http://host:port/solr/collection1/select?q=id:1=json=true ... : Is there any

Is there any JIRA changed the stored order of multivalued field?

2016-03-19 Thread forest_soup
"789"],*/ "_version_":1529020749012008960}] }} solr v5.3.2 response: { "responseHeader":{ "status":0, "QTime":37, "params":{ "q":"id:1", "indent":"true", "wt":"json"}}, "response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[ { "id":"1", "subject_store":"111", "owner":"1", "sequence":1, "unid":"1", "customerid":"1", "servername":"1", "noteid":"1", /*"attachmentnames":["789", "456", "123"]*/, "_version_":1529046229145616384}] }} Is there any JIRA fixed making this order changed? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-there-any-JIRA-changed-the-stored-order-of-multivalued-field-tp4264325.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.