: Thanks for the reply. There are many keyword terms (<1000?) and not sure if
: Solr would choke on a query string that long. Perhaps solr is not built to
Did you try it?
1000 facet.query params is not a strain for Solr -- but you may find
problems with your servlet container if you try specify
lol. "It's not actually as hard as it sounds". When I understand what you
said, then I may agree. :-)
Thanks again!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Keyword-counts-tp3491955p3497594.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
re-indexing.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Keyword-counts-tp3491955p3497448.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Thanks for the reply. There are many keyword terms (<1000?) and not sure if
Solr would choke on a query string that long. Perhaps solr is not built to
handle this type of internal re-indexing.
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Keyword-cou
e updated from time to time,
> and display the counts for each on the main page (without having to manually
> re-index old documents).
>
> Thank you.
> Jason
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Keyword-counts-tp3491955p3491955.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
for each on the main page (without having to manually
re-index old documents).
Thank you.
Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Keyword-counts-tp3491955p3491955.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.